The temporary protection framework laid down by the TPR, first and foremost, provides a domestic legal status to beneficiaries granting legal stay in Turkey; protection from punishment for illegal entry or presence and protection from refoulement.
The evolution of discourse on and integration policy for Syrian refugees has been summarised in 2018 as follows:
“The first 4 years can be referred to as the first period in which both authorities and the Syrians themselves regarded the crisis as a rather short-term problem, an assumption because of which steps such as meeting such temporary needs as accommodation, nutrition, and health were taken rather than planning new lives.
The second period includes the years 5,6,7, and 8, the current one . In this period, due to the anticipation that the crisis is not going to be resolved in a short time, there has been a mobility in Turkey with regards to the Syrians. The Syrian population that used to live around the border towns and in South East Anatolia, have recently migrated to industrialized cities where the labor market is more active and today, Istanbul alone hosts around 600 thousand Syrians. The focal points of this second period have been participation in education opportunities, special needs of women and children, child marriage, child labor, and problems of people with chronic diseases, the disabled, and the elderly, etc. During this period, protection has come into prominence and the actors focused more on the aforementioned issues. Besides, access to livelihood and labor market has become more important subjects. As a result of the mobility in Turkey and the increase in participation in the labor market in this period, Syrians have become more visible in Turkey.”
2019 could potentially be identified as the beginning of a third period: one of social cohesion and return. As already mentioned, DGMM issued a new strategy, the Cohesion Strategy and National Action Plan. According to the strategy, six thematic areas are to be addressed by DGMM: social cohesion, information, education, health, labor market and social support (social services and benefits). However, events in Istanbul in the summer of 2019 also saw a rise in irregular migrants sent to detention centres in several cities and unregistered Syrians sent to temporary accommodation centres. Amnesty International documented cases of Syrians deported from Istanbul, including 20 cases of forced returns and other stakeholders have expressed concerns about the voluntary nature of those signing voluntary return forms, particularly from detention. After a field visit to Turkey in 2019, an NGO from Belgium reported testimonies that Syrian refugees in detention centres had been forced to sign a ‘voluntary’ return document. Several of these refugees were also mistreated by the Turkish security services or denied access to medical care.
Türk Kızılay runs 16 community centres for migrants in different locations across the country. Municipalities also have a central role in the provision of services and integration support through projects. In the past the lack of a national integration plan led to fragmentation and lack of coordination in the area of integration. The Cohesion Strategy and Action Plan (2018-2023) hopes to solve some of these issues.
International NGOs have also been active in border provinces since the beginning of the Syrian conflict. In 2015, for example, there were approximately 150 NGOs including international NGOs in Gaziantep. Currently, however, the scope of foreign NGOs’ activities is limited and under close monitoring by the competent PDMM, as organisations need to obtain permission to operate in Turkey and renew it regularly. They generally conduct cross-border activities in Syria in collaboration with DGMM and other authorities. They previously faced severe delays in obtaining residence permits for their foreign workers, but the situation seems to have been resolved as of 2018.
The Chapter: Content of Temporary Protection in Turkey contains sections on: