General (scope, grounds for accelerated procedures, time limits)
The amended Aliens Act introduces the concept of “accelerated procedure”, which can be applied in cases where the applicant:
- Only raises issues irrelevant to international protection;
- Comes from a Safe Country of Origin;
- Has misled the authorities by presenting false information or documents or by withholding relevant information or documents relating to his or her identity and/or nationality which could have a negative impact on the decision;
- Has likely in bad faith destroyed or disposed of an identity or travel document that would have helped establish his or her identity or nationality;
- Has made clearly inconsistent, contradictory, clearly false or obviously improbable representations which contradict sufficiently verified country of origin information, thereby making his or her claim clearly unconvincing;
- Has made an admissible Subsequent Application;
- Has made an application merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of an earlier or imminent removal decision;
- Entered the territory irregularly or prolonged his or her stay irregularly and without good reasons has failed to present him or herself or apply as soon as possible;
- Refuses to comply with the obligation to have his or her fingerprints taken; or
- May for serious reasons be considered a danger to the national security or public order, or has been forcibly removed for serious reasons of national security or public order.
The CGRS shall decide on the application within 15 working days. When the application is treated under the accelerated procedure on the aforementioned grounds, it may pronounce the application as manifestly unfounded. This has effects on the order to leave the territory, which will be valid between 0-7 days instead of 30 days.
Exactly the same legal provisions apply to the personal interview in the accelerated procedures, including the ones dealing with the admissibility of the application, as to the one in the Regular Procedure. The only difference provided for is that in case of detention, the interview takes place in the detention centre where the applicant is being held, but this has no impact on the way the interview takes place as such. Also an interpreter is present during these interviews. The CGRS conducts interviews through videoconference in the closed detention centres. However, after the Council of State annulled the decision of the CGRS to conduct interviews by videoconference in open reception centres because the CGRS is not competent to modify conditions of the personal interviews, the CALL has recently extended this ruling to the longstanding practice of interviews through videoconference for people residing in closed detention centres given that, here too, that practice was based solely on a CGRS decision and thus illegal. The CGRS now expressed its intention to recommend the Secretary of State to take legal initiative to ground interviews through videoconference in the Royal Decree. (see Regular procedure)
An appeal in the accelerated procedure must be lodged within 10 days, and has suspensive effect. 
The right to legal aid applies in exactly the same way to the accelerated procedure as it does in the Regular Procedure. “Pro-Deo” lawyers get exactly the same remuneration for similar interventions in accelerated procedures as in regular ones. In order to avoid that crucial time would be lost with formally getting the appointment of a lawyer arranged in time, it is accepted that formal appointment of the lawyer can take place until one month after the actual intervention.
 Article 57/6/1(1) Aliens Act.
 Article 57/6/1(2) Aliens Act.
 Article 13 Royal Decree on CGRS Procedure.
 CALL judgment no. 247 396 of 14 January 2021.
 Article 39/57(1)(2) Aliens Act.