Types of accommodation

Belgium

Country Report: Types of accommodation Last updated: 30/11/20

Author

Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen Visit Website

Accommodation may be collective i.e. a centre or individual reception facilities i.e. a house, studio or flat,[1] depending on the profile of the asylum seeker and the phase of the asylum procedure the asylum seeker is in (see section on Forms and Levels of Material Reception Conditions).

Fedasil was established in 2001 to manage the network of reception centres in an efficient and coordinated way and has fallen under the competence of the Secretary of State for Migration and Integration since the end of 2011. Fedasil is in charge of the management and coordination of the network, which includes collective and individual reception places, in addition to other responsibilities such as coordinating the voluntary return programs, the observation and orientation of unaccompanied children and the integration of reception facilities in the municipalities.[2] To implement its coordinating and executing competencies, Fedasil regularly issues instructions on different aspects of material reception conditions in practice. 

The practical organisation is done in partnership between government bodies, NGOs and private partners.[3] The partners include amongst others the Flemish and the Francophone Red Cross, Ciré, Caritas International and the communal PCSW. During 2016 and 2017 the government closed 10 000 reception places, a lot of which were created during 2015 when Belgium had a large influx of asylum seekers. In the beginning of 2018 the government decided to close an additional 2,500 collective reception places and 4,000 individual places. By the summer of 2018 it became clear that, due to these closures and a growing number of asylum requests in comparison to the previous year, there would not be enough places left. The government then decided – at the end of September 2018 – to keep 7 collective centres open that were initially supposed to close. At the end of 2018, the capacity of the reception system was still too limited, forcing the immigration office to refuse the applications for international protection of asylum seekers and thus their access to the reception system (see Right to shelter and assignment to a centre). In order to be able to provide more accommodations, the closure of many individual places was postponed as well.

During 2019 this precarious situation persisted and the lack of staff at the Immigration Office and the CGRS resulted in lengthy asylum procedures, thus forcing Fedasil to continuously open new places throughout the year. Amongst these new places, many places included tents and containers which are not adequate to meet the needs of certain applicants.[4] This situation also led to the introduction of new instructions by Fedasil limiting the reception conditions for several categories of asylum seekers (see Right to reception: Dublin procedureand Right to reception: Applicants with a protection status in another EU Member State).[5]  It should further be noted that the saturation of the Fedasil reception network has put resettlement operations on hold since July 2019. The operations will resume once the reception capacity has improved.[6]               

As of January 2020, the 71 main collective reception centres were mainly managed and organised by:

 

Collective reception centres: Management and capacity

Partner

Number of centres

Total capacity

Fedasil

29

8,785

Croix Rouge

24

6,716

Rode Kruis

18

3,627

Source: Statistics of 1 January 2020, available at: https://www.fedasil.be/nl/statistics.

 

The individual reception initiatives are mainly run by the PCSW and by NGO partners. As of 1 January 2020, the PCSW had 5,975 places in LRI, while NGO partners currently have 501 places.

The entire reception system had a total 26,751 places, out of which 25,711 (96%) were occupied on 1 January 2020. An occupation rate of 94% is considered as a saturation of the reception network so Fedasil is still continuously looking for new places.[7]

There are also specialised centres for specific categories of applicants (see Special Reception Needs).

 


[1] Article 16, 62 and 64 Reception Act.

[2] Article 56 Reception Act.

[3] Article 62 Reception Act.                                                                                

[4]   Myria, Contact Meeting, September 2019, https://bit.ly/397g0sz; Contact Meeting, October 2019, https://bit.ly/2TmOrEN ; Contact Meeting, November 2019, https://bit.ly/3af2qDg ; Contact Meeting, December 2019,  https://bit.ly/385AZL0.

[5] Fedasil, ‘Sluiting 7 centra uitgesteld’, 2 October 2018, available in Dutch at https://bit.ly/2RfAANv; Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen, ‘Staatssecretaris zet limiet op asielaanvragen: vandaag al 60 mensen op straat’, 23 November 2018, https://bit.ly/2DAo7R7; De Morgen, ’Opvangcentra zitten overvol door grotere instroom: tenten voor asielzoekers weer in beeld’, 16 November 2018, avaialble in Dutch at: https://bit.ly/2Wzhu91; Fedasil, ‘Druk op opvangnetwerk steeds hoger’, 8 November 2019, avaialble in Dutch, https://bit.ly/384yGry; Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen, ‘Opnieuw asielzoekers op straat, kroniek van een aangekondigde opvangcrisis’,18 November 2019, available in Dutch at: https://bit.ly/2TplTdM; Vlaamse Vereniging voor Steden en Gemeenten, ‘Lokale besturen zijn jojo-effect federaal opvangbeleid beu’, 13 November 2019, available in Dutch at: https://bit.ly/2VuNEV9.

[6]  Fedasil, The resettlement of refugees on hold, 12 March 2020, available at: https://bit.ly/2JDIQW5.

[7]   Myria, Contact Meeting, December 2019, available in Dutch at: https://bit.ly/2whWOcL.

 

Table of contents

  • Statistics
  • Overview of the legal framework
  • Overview of the main changes since the previous report update
  • Asylum Procedure
  • Reception Conditions
  • Detention of Asylum Seekers
  • Content of International Protection
  • ANNEX I – Transposition of the CEAS in national legislation