The Asylum Act defines an “applicant in need of special procedural guarantees” in terms of reduced ability to benefit from the rights and comply with the obligations stemming from the Asylum Act due to his or her individual circumstances. Even though it does not include an exhaustive list of asylum seekers presumed to be in need of special procedural guarantees, it refers to age, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, serious illness, mental disorders, torture, rape or other serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence as possible factors underlying individual circumstances that could lead to the need of special procedural guarantees.
Within these applicants, the Asylum Act identifies a sub-category of individuals whose special procedural needs result from torture, rape, or other serious forms of psychological, physical or sexual violence that may be exempted from border procedures and hence detention. Furthermore, the placement of unaccompanied and separated children in detention facilities at the border must comply with applicable international recommendations such as those by UNHCR, UNICEF, and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
- An internal review of the functioning of the CIT at Lisbon Airport;
- The urgent presentation by SEF of a report on the recommendations issued by the Ombudsman in 2017 regarding the above-mentioned centre;
- That children under 16 years old (whether accompanied or not) cannot be detained in the CIT for more than 7 days;
- That the construction of the Temporary Reception Centre of Almoçageme (CATA), located in the municipality of Sintra, is given maximum priority. So far there is no definite public information on whether it will be an open or closed centre.
At the time of writing, no information on the results of the internal reviews conducted within this context was publicly available and the construction of the CATA has been apparently abandoned.
A study focusing on the situation of asylum-seeking unaccompanied children and ageing out in Portugal published in 2021 revealed that those questioned described detention at the airport (which lasted for some days/weeks) as scary both due to the fear of deportation, and to the tension in the relationship with the authorities.
 Article 17-A(1) Asylum Act.
 Article 17-A(4) Asylum Act.
 Article 26(2) Asylum Act.
 Ombudsman, Tratamento dos cidadãos estrangeiros em situação irregular ou requerentes de asilo nos centros de instalação temporária ou espaços equiparados, September 2017, p28, available in Portuguese at: https://bit.ly/3eLMNX6.
 See e.g. Público, ‘Provedora, “Centros de instalação são o no man’s land contemporâneo”’, 22 July 2018, available in Portuguese at: https://bit.ly/2Ul9URU; Expresso, ‘UNICEF Portugal exige fim de detenção de crianças no aeroporto’, 24 July 2018, available in Portuguese at: https://bit.ly/2G9xisZ.
 Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding observations on the combined fifth and sixth periodic reports of Portugal, CRC/C/PRT/CO/5-6, 9 December 2019, par.42(a) and (d), available at: https://bit.ly/2G1F07z?
 Sandra Roberto, Carla Moleiro, ed. Observatório das Migrações, De menor a maior: acolhimento e autonomia de vida em menores não acompanhados, April 2021, p.50, available at: https://bit.ly/3fqMKBK.