Author
International protection applicants are offered accommodation by the Irish State in reception centres under a system known as ‘Direct Provision.’ The State directly provides accommodation and board, along with a weekly allowance for personal requisites (as of January 2026 € 38.80 for adults and € 29.80 for children), a medical card and ancillary supports for individuals awaiting a decision on their application for international protection. The Direct Provision system is overseen by the International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS), a subdivision of the Department of Justice and Equality.
Upon lodging an application for international protection, applicants are referred to IPAS. Previously, applicants were initially accommodated at Balseskin Reception Centre near Dublin Airport for a number of weeks to facilitate a preliminary interview at the IPO, as well as health screening and registration for Community Welfare Service assistance. However, owing to capacity constraints within the international protection accommodation system, from March 2022, Citywest Hotel and Convention Centre was contracted by the International Protection Accommodation Service and repurposed as a transit hub for the processing of beneficiaries of Temporary Protection, as well as for the accommodation of some newly arrived international protection applicants.
Throughout the course of 2025, reception standards continued to deteriorate. 2025 saw a continued reliance by the State on so-called ‘emergency centres’ and tented accommodation. Applicants continued to be accommodated in congregated and overcrowded settings without access to basic public services.[1]
Plans for an additional tented accommodation facility to be located at Thornton Hall, Co. Dublin were temporarily suspended on 5 November 2024, after the State indicated its intention not to contest judicial review proceedings instigated in respect of the proposed development. The proceedings were instigated by local residents who alleged that a Ministerial Order made in respect of the site ought not be allowed to stand due to a lack of adequate environmental screening having been conducted in advance of establishment of the facility.[2] Subsequently, on 18 November 2024, it was reported that a revised Ministerial Order would be issued ‘within weeks’, however, development of the site remained suspended.[3] The proceedings followed several months of disruptive protests at the site by locals who objected to the development.[4] In late 2025, the High Court formally quashed the ministerial order that had allowed the centre to be set up without full planning and environmental approval, declaring the centre’s fast-tracked approval legally invalid. However, the judge allowed a four-month stay on the order taking effect and on this basis, the Government has until early March 2026 to pass corrective legislation. Throughout the course of proceedings, the centre continued to operate, albeit at a significantly reduced capacity. However, as of late 2025, the temporary structures on the site were dismantled and the site was cleared.[5]
Citywest Hotel and Convention Centre also continued to operate throughout the year as both a transit hub for the processing of beneficiaries of Temporary Protection, as well as for the accommodation of newly arrived international protection applicants. In June 2025, it was announced that the State had approved plans to proceed with the purchase of the Citywest Hotel and Convention Centre for a sum of €148.2m. The State had been leasing the property from a private contractor since 2020, when it was initially used as a site for administering Covid vaccinations and later converted for use as a transit hub.[6] As of December 2025, there were 385 international protection applicants residing at Citywest Convention Centre.[7]
As of January 2026, there were 33,215 persons accommodated within the IPAS system, 25, 662 of which were accommodated in emergency accommodation.[8]
While there is no obligation on an asylum applicant to remain in Direct Provision during the status determination process, if they do opt to leave or stay elsewhere Direct Provision allowance payments are withdrawn. Applicants who opt to reside in Direct Provision centres are accommodated until they are granted some form of status and are subsequently integrated into the community. However, in practice, a significant number of individuals who have been granted status have been unable to move out of Direct Provision owing to a lack of available and affordable housing. The housing crisis in Ireland continues to exacerbate the situation. According to latest available figures, as of January 2026, there were approximately 5,000 individuals with status residing in Direct Provision centres around the country.[9]
The transposition of the Reception Conditions Directive
Until 2018, Ireland had not been party to the Reception Conditions Directive.[10] However, the Supreme Court in its judgment in N.V.H. v. Minister for Justice and Equality, which dealt with the situation of an asylum applicant who had been living in Direct Provision for eight years with no access to employment, declared that the indefinite prohibition on employment for people in the asylum process was unconstitutional. The Court provided the State with a six-month period within which to review the ban on employment (see Access to the Labour Market) and to make proposals for providing effective access to the labour market for people in the asylum process. In its response, the Government announced on 22 November 2017 that it would opt into the recast Reception Conditions Directive.[11]
While the prohibition on seeking employment was struck down on 9 February 2018, opt into the Directive was only crystallised by the adoption of the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018 on 6 July 2018. Transposition was done by way of secondary legislation, a statutory instrument, enacted by the Minister for Justice and Equality.
Although this has placed the reception system on a legislative footing for the first time, the practice which preceded the Regulations continues to govern the approach to reception for people seeking international protection. In July 2019, the Irish Refugee Council published a report analysing the transposition of the Directive one year later.[12] Particular concerns were the absence of a vulnerability assessment and the rapid increase in the number of people dispersed to ad hoc emergency accommodation premises due to the lack of available bed spaces in Direct Provision accommodation. As of 2026, the extent to which the provisions of the Regulations have been implemented in practice continues to vary significantly.
At the end of January 2021, a pilot programme for the conducting of vulnerability assessments was established at Balseskin reception centre in Dublin. Officials from the International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) are carrying out assessments with the assistance of a social worker from the IPO. The pilot scheme initially assessed applicants seeking accommodation from the State and was subsequently extended to all new applicants seeking international protection.[13] After a suspension between March and November 2024, it was announced that vulnerability assessments would resume and would be conducted by GoodPeople Homecare Ltd. According to IPAS, it is aimed to conduct 350 assessments a week, beginning with the existing backlog. Initially, vulnerability assessments were to be conducted at Citywest, with a view to expanding the service to the International Protection Office in the New Year[14] Throughout 2025, 4, 537 vulnerability assessments were conducted. Of those assessed. 4,048 individuals were deemed to be vulnerable in accordance with the Regulations (see Screening of vulnerability).
The “McMahon Report” and Direct Provision reform
The 2015 McMahon Report marked the first comprehensive review of Ireland’s protection process and Direct Provision system in 15 years, making over 170 recommendations for reform;[15] however, former Working Group members later observed that implementation was uneven, delayed, and often partial.[16] Building on this report, draft National Standards for Direct Provision accommodation were developed in 2018, consulted on publicly, and finalised in 2019 to standardise conditions across centres.[17] While intended as a key reform, the Standards initially lacked independent oversight, raising concerns about accountability and enforcement. Although the Standards became legally binding in January 2021, inspections continued to be conducted by IPAS and its contractors until the government confirmed in October 2021 that HIQA would assume responsibility for independent monitoring.[18]
As of 9 January 2024, the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) assumed the responsibility for monitoring and inspecting International Protection Accommodations Service centres against the legally binding National Standards for Accommodation Offered to People in the Protection Process. This function is conferred upon HIQA by an amendment to the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018 by way of the European Communities (Reception Conditions) (Amendment) Regulations 2023 (S.I. No. 649 of 2023).[19] HIQA commenced inspections in early 2024, and in April 2024, published its first inspection reports.[20] As of November 2024, reports had been published in respect of nine centres. Three of the centres inspected were found to have no non-compliances identified against the National Standards. The remaining six had varying levels of compliance. The areas of non-compliance identified included assessment and response to special needs of residents, contingency planning and preparedness, accommodation, food, catering and cooking facilities, governance, accountability and leadership, responsiveness of workforce and safeguarding and protection.[21] In one of the centres, inspectors found that a safeguarding incident involving the welfare of four children was not managed in line with national policy or guidance. Whereby non-compliance, providers were required to submit compliance plans in order to demonstrate what improvements they will make in order to bring the centre into compliance with the National Standards.[22]
During 2025, HIQA continued to exercise its statutory oversight function in relation to permanent IPAS centres, conducting inspections to assess compliance with the National Standards. HIQA’s inspections focused on quality, safety, governance and the lived experience of residents in permanent accommodation settings. HIQA published multiple inspection statements over the course of the year, with inspection reports released in January, February, May, June, August, November and December 2025. These covered a broad range of permanent IPAS centres located in counties across the country.[23] Several were found to have no non-compliances identified against the National Standards. However, a number of non-compliances were also identified across inspections. Common themes included instances where leadership structures, reporting systems or awareness of responsibilities amongst centre staff were insufficient,[24] inadequate implementation of safeguarding procedures,[25] substandard accommodation arrangements,[26] inadequate contingency planning and emergency preparedness, and ineffective systems for identifying and responding to the special needs of residents.[27] For each instance of non-compliance, HIQA required that service providers submit comprehensive compliance plans outlining how deficits would be addressed in order to achieve full compliance with the national standards
Report of the Advisory Group on the Provision of Support including Accommodation to Persons in the International Protection Process
In November 2019, the Government announced a new expert advisory group to look at a ‘long term approach to how people seeking asylum are accommodated and supported’. The group, chaired by former European Commission secretary general Dr. Catherine Day, was tasked with making a series of recommendations to end the Direct Provision system and transform the international protection process.
Following an extensive review process, the group’s report was published on 21 October 2020. Launching the report, the group’s chair Dr. Catherine Day stated that a “whole-of-government approach” is required in order to successfully replace the system. She further added that “continued political oversight” was crucial in implementing the new system.[28]
The Advisory Group was concerned with two primary issues – the length of time that asylum applicants spend in the system and the type of accommodation and the support they receive while awaiting a final determination on their application for international protection.[29]
Amongst the most significant of the Advisory Group’s recommendations is the abolition of the “congregated and segregated accommodation” of applicants for international protection by mid-2023.[30] Instead, applicants ought to be initially housed in a designated State-owned reception centre for a three-month period. An onsite multi-service centre should assist applicants in accessing the necessary services and entitlements, including legal aid and post-reception centre housing placement.[31] During this period, applicants should also be provided with a weekly cash allowance, a Temporary Residence Card, PPS number and access to ancillary supports such as a medical card, education and training. Applicants should also receive medical and vulnerability assessments within 30 days of making their application for international protection. Following the implementation of the revised vulnerability assessment policy discussed above, newly arrived applicants are required to self-refer, or be referred by a support service, to undergo a vulnerability assessment. The Irish Refugee Council also remains concerned about the lack of information provided to applicants regarding the assessment. It evident in our contact with clients that many individuals undergoing the vulnerability assessment are not aware of the purpose of the assessment, nor do they understand what the information acquired will be used for. It is thus apparent that many newly-arrived applicants have not yet undergone an assessment upon arrival in the State.
Following the initial 3-month reception period, applicants ought to be provided with own-door accommodation in a local community and be permitted to access a Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) equivalent. The Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage would be responsible for securing housing placements. Social welfare allowance would be aligned with mainstream income supports and multi-service support would be provided with work placement, access to education and training, medical card and integration support for a period of up to 18 months following a positive decision.
In the event that a negative determination is made and in circumstances whereby all avenues of appeal are exhausted, an applicant ought to be provided with own-door accommodation and housing allowance for a period of 3-6 months pending removal from the State. Social welfare allowance would be aligned with mainstream income supports for up to 6 months, while multi-service support would also continue during this period.[32]
The report also makes a number of recommendations that ought to be implemented in the short-term, until the new, permanent system enters into force. These include appointing the HIQA as an independent inspectorate to examine conditions in Direct Provision centres and ensure that the National Standards are being adequately implemented.[33] Further immediate recommendations include facilitating access to driving licences and bank accounts, as well as removing restrictions on the right to work.[34]
Additionally, according to the Report, binding deadlines must apply for each stage of the international protection process. It is recommended that the IPO and IPAT should issue decisions within 6 months.[35] In order to clear the backlog of existing cases, the report recommends that a simplified approach ought to be taken whereby an individual has been in the protection process for over 2 years by the end of 2020. In such circumstances, the individual ought to be offered permission to remain for a five-year period without prejudice to their pending application for international protection.[36]
The recommendations of the Advisory Group were assessed by relevant Government Ministers and their departments and informed the development of the Government’s White Paper on replacing the Direct Provision system. The White Paper was published on 26 February 2021.[37]
Government White Paper on Ending Direct Provision
The Government’s long-awaited White Paper on Ending Direct Provision was published on 26 February 2021. The paper establishes a variety of measures aimed at ending the system of Direct Provision and replacing it with a not-for-profit model. The paper broadly reflects the recommendations of the Advisory Group’s report and sets out a roadmap towards establishing a new international protection accommodation policy, to be in place by 2024.[38]
The new model proposes a two-phased approach to accommodating applicants for international protection. In Phase One, it is proposed that the applicant will be accommodated in a designated Reception and Integration Centre for a period of four months. The focus during this phase will be on identifying the applicants’ particular needs and linking them with appropriate support services. Accommodation in Reception and Integration Centres will be own-door for families and own-room for single people, with specific accommodation tailored to individuals with identified vulnerabilities. Applicants are to be provided with comprehensive information about the International Protection process, including information regarding Legal Aid Board services, Health services, Education supports, Childcare and Employment activation. An intensive orientation and English language programme will also be provided. Vulnerability Assessments will be carried out in order to determine particular accommodation and support needs and applicants will be linked with appropriate services accordingly. Applicants will continue to receive a bespoke allowance while in the Reception and Integration Centre, similar to that currently provided. In total, six Reception and Integration Centres will be established and operated by the newly established International Protection Support Service.[39]
Under Phase Two, it is proposed that all accommodation provided will be own-door, self-contained houses or apartments for families, with single people housed in either own-door or own-room accommodation. Accommodation will be located in all counties and the location and number of applicants to be accommodated in each county will be determined according to a national settlement pattern. Different supports will apply to the applicant depending on the accommodation strand provided. For vulnerable persons, supports will be provided by not-for-profit organisations contracted and funded by the Department of Children, Equality and Disability, Integration and Youth to provide the service in a particular location. Whereby the applicant is not deemed vulnerable, resettlement workers, overseen by the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, will act at county level to link applicants with supports and services. Applicants and their families will have the right to access mainstream services, including education and health services. Access to further intensive English language supports will also be provided.[40]
The report has been widely welcomed by migrant rights groups in that it goes some way towards developing an all-government approach to ending the system of Direct Provision. However, a major weakness identified in the paper is that it fails to incorporate the Day Advisory Group recommendation in relation to offering permission to remain to people who are two or more years in the system. One of the issues associated with the current process is that the processing of applications takes too long, the result being that asylum applicants spend years waiting for a decision on their application, effectively putting their lives on hold. This ultimately causes considerable capacity issues within the system and, unless the current sizable backlog of cases is resolved, implementation of the Paper’s key recommendations will be significantly hampered.
Following the publication of the White Paper, a team was established in the Department of Justice in order to lead the transition to a new accommodation model for international protection applicants. Additionally, the Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Roderic O’Gorman appointed a programme board. The newly appointed board includes officials from the relevant Departments and agencies and independent members from various non-governmental organisations tasked with overseeing the transition to the new model. The programme board has met four times since it was established, with a fifth meeting scheduled for mid-December 2021. Minister O’Gorman also appointed a three-person external advisory group to act as an independent observer and oversee the implementation of the new model. Additionally, it was announced that the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, working with the Housing Agency, had begun the acquisition of properties for use during phase 2, that is, after people have completed an initial four months in a reception and integration centre and are moved into the community. It was envisaged that applicants would move into this accommodation beginning in 2022 and for this process to accelerate in the following years as more properties are acquired.[41] However, in light of the continuing accommodation crisis, it became apparent that the Government’s aim of ending Direct Provision by 2024 was no longer feasible.[42] Following a review conducted by the Department of Integration of projected timelines and deliverables contained in the White Paper, and a reassessment of the projections underpinning proposed reforms,[43] the Minister for Integration announced that he would bring a revised White Paper to Cabinet in November 2023 setting out a longer-term plan to end the system of Direct Provision.[44]
On 27 March 2024, it was announced that the Government had agreed a new Comprehensive Accommodation Strategy for International Protection applicants. Following the publication of the White Paper to End Direct Provision in 2021, significant increases in the numbers of those seeking international protection in the State, as well as the requirement to accommodate beneficiaries of temporary protection, have resulted in significant challenges to the State’s ability to provide accommodation in respect of those seeking international protection. A revised accommodation strategy was therefore published, both with a view to responding to the current homelessness crisis, as well as in order to establish a revised accommodation model, amending the approach outlined in the White Paper in order to take account of the increased number of arrivals.[45] The Strategy foresees a move away from full State reliance on private accommodation providers, and towards a core of State-owned accommodation. The State aims to deliver 14,000 state-owned beds by 2028, and this will be supplemented by commercial providers. In order to deal with the demand-led nature of the system, the commissioning of emergency commercial accommodation will continue to be a feature in the short to medium term. According to the State it is the intention of the strategy to put an end to the use of unsuitable accommodation options currently relied upon and gain greater control in respect of the geographic distribution, allocation and dispersal of applicants.[46] The Irish Refugee Council stated in a press release that, while the plan has several positive elements such as confirmation of a child benefit style payment and accommodation for vulnerable groups, it is extremely light on detail, dependent on funding that is not yet confirmed, and crucially, does not demonstrate a sufficiently urgent way to end the current homelessness crisis. [47]
Joint Committee on Justice and Equality
In December 2019, the Joint Committee on Justice and Equality of the Oireachtas published the ‘Report on Direct Provision and the International Protection Application Process December 2019’.[48] This report called for a fundamental reform of the Direct Provision system and describes it as ‘not fit for purpose’.
The members of the Committee found that ‘shared, institutionalised living fails to fully respect the rights to privacy and human dignity of those placed in these centres. The issues pointed out in the report of the all-party group include:
- Inadequate support and services that do not cater to the needs of vulnerable individuals arriving in Ireland;
- Long delays in the single application process;
- Issues with accessing the labour market; and
- Issues relating to children in the Direct Provision system.[49]
The report made 43 conclusions and recommendations and followed a series of public hearings with stakeholder groups and the receipt of more than 140 written submissions and visits by the Committee to Direct Provision centres in Mosney and Monaghan. Amongst its recommendations there was the change to ‘own door’ accommodation units for individuals and families; leaving behind the current ‘for profit’ running of direct provision, and the involvement of approved housing bodies in the provision of accommodation and services.[50] The work of the Joint Committee ceased with the dissolution of the 32nd Dáil in January 2020. However, many of the findings made by the Committee subsequently informed the work of the Advisory Group on the Provision of Support including Accommodation to Persons in the International Protection Process.
Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
In 2019, the UN Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in its Concluding observations on the combined fifth to ninth reports of Ireland expressed its concerns about Ireland’s Direct Provision system, referring to its continuous failure to provide adequate accommodation for protection applicants and in particular regarding:
- The lengthy stay in inadequate living conditions in Direct Provision centres and its significant impact on mental health and family life of protection applicants;
- The operation of Direct Provision centres by private actors on a for-profit basis without proper regulation or accountability mechanisms;
- The extensive use of emergency accommodation for lengthy periods due to the capacity limit of Direct Provision centres and the housing crisis, the substandard living conditions of emergency accommodation and the lack of necessary services and support provided therein;
- The reported lack of transparency regarding the deaths of persons residing in these centres (art.5).[51]
After expressing such concerns, the CERD made the recommendation to Ireland to phase out the Direct Provision system and develop an alternative reception model, with a series of interim measures:
- Improve living conditions in Direct Provision centres and reduce the length of stay in the centres;
- Set up clear standards of reception conditions for Direct Provision centres; regulate and inspect the operation of Direct Provision centres; and hold those responsible accountable in case of breach of standards;
- Halt the emergency accommodation as soon as possible and develop a contingency planning framework with a view to effectively responding to capacity pressures;
- Ensure transparency regarding the deaths in Direct Provision centres and collect and publish data on the deaths in the centres.[52]
STAD (Standing Against Direct Provision) Coalition
The STAD coalition was founded by eight NGOs in January 2022 with a view to lobbying the Government to deliver on the commitment to bring an end to direct provision in the next two years. Membership is comprised of Nasc, Amnesty International Ireland, Crosscare, Cultúr, Doras, the Immigrant Council of Ireland, the Irish Refugee Council, and the Movement of Asylum Applicants in Ireland. The coalition’s primary aim is to replace Direct Provision with an alternative system by 2024, ensure that all emergency reception centres are closed as an immediate priority and reduce processing times for international protection applications and appeals. STAD has also called for HIQA to be provided with a mandate to independently inspect Direct Provision centres while they remain operation and for urgent measures identified in the Catherine Day report to be implemented immediately, such as an increase in the daily expenses allowance, making the right to work available after three months, and the provision a comprehensive vulnerability assessment to all applicants for international protection.[53]
In October 2023, the STAD coalition called upon the government to publish and implement a new White Paper on Direct Provision without delay. They called for a new roadmap to set out clear timelines for ending the use of the Direct Provision accommodation system, and for a human rights compliant alternative.[54] At the time of updating (January 2026), no such revised Paper was forthcoming.[55] The coalition also renewed its appeal for access to early legal advice for all those applying for international protection, independent HIQA inspections of all Direct Provision and emergency accommodation centres, and renewed efforts to ensure homelessness is not a recurring issue for international protection applicants and those who have received immigration status in Ireland.[56]
[1] Information provided by IRC Informtion and Advocacy Service, January 2026.
[2] Irish Examiner, ‘Thornton Hall plan to house 1,000 asylum seekers thrown into doubt’, 5 November 2024, available here.
[3] Irish Times, ‘‘New Ministerial Order to be made in weeks’, says Dept’, 18 November 2024, available here.
[4] Breakingnews.ie, ‘Thornton Hall protestor recorded making clear threat to security on site, court told’, 12 August 2024, available here.
[5] ibid.
[6] RTE, ‘Government agrees €148m purchase of Citywest Hotel and campus’, 18 June 2025, available here.
[7] Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, ‘IPAS Weekly Accommodation and Arrivals Statistics’, 14 December 2025, available here.
[8] IPAS, DCEDIY IPAS – Weekly Stats, 18 January 2026, available here.
[9] Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, Response to Parliamentary Question No 431, 2 December 2025, available here.
[10] Irish Refugee Council, ‘The Reception Conditions Directive: One Year On’, July 2019, available here.
[11] Department of Justice and Equality, ‘Government agrees framework for access to work for International Protection Applicants’, 21 November 2017, available here.
[12] Irish Refugee Council, ‘The Reception Conditions Directive: One Year On’, July 2019, available here.
[13] ibid.
[14] Information provided by IPAS, November 2024.
[15] Department of Justice and Equality, Speech by Minister Fitzgerald: Publication of the Report of the Working Group on the Protection Process, 30 June 2015 available here.
[16] Irish Times, ‘Five years since McMahon report and 7,700 still in Direct Provision’, 30 June 2020, available here.
[17] For further details on the McMahon report and the 2018 National standards, see previous updates to this country report, available here.
[18] Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth Roderic O’Gorman, Response to Parliamentary Question No 107, 7 October 2021, available here.
[19] HIQA, ‘International Protection Accommodation’, January 2024, available here.
[20] ibid.
[21] Breakingnews.ie, ‘Non-compliance with food and protection found in some direct provision centres – HIQA, 27 November 2024, available here.
[22] ibid.
[23] HIQA, ‘Inspection Reports’, available here.
[24] HIQA, ‘International Protection Accommodation Service centres publication statement 15 August 2025’, 15th August 2025, available here.
[25] HIQA, ‘International Protection Accommodation Service centres publication statement 05 November 2025’, 5th November 2025, available here.
[26] ibid.
[27] ibid.
[28] The Journal, ‘Catherine Day: ‘Continued political oversight’ needed to end Direct Provision’, 21 October 2020, available here.
[29] Advisory Group on Direct Provision, Report of the Advisory Group on the Provision of Support including Accommodation to Persons in the International Protection Process, 21 October 2020, available here, 5.
[30] ibid, 8.
[31] ibid, 12.
[32] ibid.
[33] ibid, 12.
[34] ibid, 80.
[35] ibid, 56.
[36] ibid, 56.
[37] Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, White Paper on Ending Direct Provision, 26 February 2021, available here.
[38] Ibid.
[39] Ibid, 42.
[40] Ibid, 43.
[41] Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth Roderic O’Gorman, Response to Parliamentary Question Nos 12, 14, 74, 77 and 82, 3 December 2021, available here.
[42] The Irish Times, ‘Plan to end direct provision by 2023 set to be watered down amid pressure from Ukraine war’, 20th October 2022, available here.
[43] Minister for Chilren, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth Roderic O’Gorman, Response to Parliamentary Question No 436, 13th December 2022, available here.
[44] Irish Times, ‘New plan to end direct provision to be set out in revised White Paper’, 23 October 2023, available here.
[45] Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, ‘Government agrees new comprehensive accommodation strategy for International Protection applicants’, 27 March 2024, available here.
[46] ibid.
[47] Irish Refugee Council, ‘Press release: Irish Refugee Council express concern over pact opt in and international protection accommodation plan and raise serious alarm about risk of homeless women and children’, March 2024, available here.
[48] Houses of the Oireachtais, Joint Committee on Justice and Equality report finds Direct Provision ‘not fit for purpose’ and calls for fundamental reform of ‘flawed’ international protection application process, 12 December 2019, available here.
[49] ibid.
[50] ibid.
[51] UN CERD, Concluding observations on the combined fifth to ninth reports of Ireland, 12 December 2019, CERD/C/IRL/CO/5-9, available here.
[52] Ibid.
[53] STAD, Coalition to end Direct Provision launched by leading not-for-profit groups, 26 January 2022, available here.
[54] STAD, Call for new White Paper on Direct Provision to be published without delay’, October 13 2023, available here.
[55] Information provided by Irish Refugee Council Policy and Advocacy Officer, February 2024.
[56] STAD, Call for new White Paper on Direct Provision to be published without delay’, October 13 2023, available here.