According to the law, when an application for asylum is lodged by an unaccompanied child, the Aliens and Immigration Unit, which is the authority responsible for receiving asylum applications, must immediately notify the Head of the Asylum Service, who must subsequently notify the Director of Social Welfare Services. In practice, until recently there was no proper identification mechanism, save for the police officers at the Aliens and Immigration Unit having to verify the ages on asylum applications in order to identify children. However, this was not done systematically, nor is there a procedure to identify children who may have entered the country on false documents that show them to be over the age of 18.
With the establishment of Pournara, persons who have recently arrived in the areas under the effective control of the RoC in an irregular manner are referred to the Centre for registration, including unaccompanied children. The services provided at the First Reception Centre include identification, registration, and lodging of asylum applications, as well as medical screening and vulnerability assessments, and when possible, the full assessment of the asylum application at the new Asylum Examination Centre adjacent to the first reception centre.
The law provides that the Director of Social Welfare Services acts, either in person or via an officer of the Social Welfare Services, as a representative of unaccompanied children in the procedures provided in the Refugee Law. For judicial proceedings, the Social Welfare Services ensures the representation of unaccompanied children pursuant to the Commissioner for the Protection of Children’s Rights (Commissioner Appointment by the Court as Child Representative) Procedural Rules of 2014. Therefore, representation remains with the Social Welfare Services throughout the asylum procedures except for judicial proceedings where the Commissioner for Children’s Rights is responsible for appointing legal representation.
According to the law, guardianship has automatic and immediate effect, without a decision or act, whereas representation must be taken up and carried out as soon as possible. There is no procedural formality for the Social Welfare Services to take up either appointment, and they apply for all procedures.
The role of the representative entails assistance and representation during the administrative examination of the asylum application. In addition, the law provides that the Asylum Service shall ensure that the representative is given the opportunity to inform the unaccompanied child about the meaning and possible consequences of the personal interview and, where appropriate, how to prepare themselves for the personal interview. The Asylum Service, according to the Law, permits the representative to be present at the first instance interview and ask questions or make comments, within the framework set by the responsible officer/caseworker who conducts the interview. On the other hand, the guardian is responsible for the overall well-being of the child, including accommodation, school arrangements, and access to healthcare.
In practice, regarding the representation carried out by the Social Welfare Services, the appointed officer does not usually have adequate knowledge or training on legal or asylum issues. During the interview, the representative is always present, but as they do not have sufficient knowledge or training on legal or asylum issues, they are not in a position to contribute in a substantial way. In all cases monitored by the Cyprus Refugee Council, the representative has never asked any questions or made any comments after the interview. In late 2020, there was an increase in the number of Social Welfare Officers assigned as guardians to unaccompanied children. Specifically, 3 guardians are assigned for the UASC in Nicosia, 3 in Larnaca, 3 in Limassol, and 2 in Paphos. As such, their involvement with the children had substantially improved as they are in a position to have frequent meetings with them and have a knowledge of each child’s history and needs. Issues arising from lack of knowledge of the asylum framework and asylum procedures continued to be an issue, despite the increased number of Social Welfare Officers acting as guardians. With the increase in numbers of UASC arriving in the country in 2021, the number of Guardians was once again not sufficient to adequately respond to their needs, and children often complained about the lack of contact with their appointed Guardian.
In instances where the asylum application is rejected, since the 2016 amendment to the Refugee Law, where an unaccompanied child needs to proceed with a judicial review of the asylum decision, the Commissioner for Children’s Rights appoints a lawyer for this purpose. The Commissioner carries out trainings with selected lawyers on the representation of children in asylum cases from time to time and has set up a list of lawyers who have received relevant training to represent, where needed, unaccompanied children in the judicial proceedings of the asylum procedure. It should be noted, however, that legal representation is not afforded to an unaccompanied child who received a negative decision after they reached the age of majority. When an unaccompanied child receives a negative decision on their asylum claim, the guardian informs the Commissioner for Children’s Rights and requests the appointment of a lawyer that would represent the child before the IPAC. The appointed lawyer, along with an officer from the Commissioner for Children’s Rights office, have a joint meeting with the child to inform them of the appointment and the procedure to be followed. The representation continues until the case is concluded before the court, regardless of whether the child has reached the age of maturity while the procedure is ongoing.
Up until 2021, when an unaccompanied child received a negative decision, a lawyer would be assigned to the child by the Commissioner for Children’s Right without any assessment on the merits of the case. However, in 2021 the Commissioner for Children’s Rights addressed a letter to the SWS stating that when a case is referred for legal representation, it should be accompanied by a report/assessment on why an appeal should be submitted on behalf of the child. No information is available on whether this recommendation has been implemented.
With respect to the Dublin procedure, there have been cases where the representative of the child did not inform the Asylum Service of the existence of relatives in other European countries, leading to the expiration of the three-month deadline to lodge a Dublin request.
The legal and policy framework for unaccompanied children has been repeatedly criticised by the national Ombudsman, who has issued two reports on the issue, stating the gaps in both policy and practice.
In 2018, the Commissioner for the Rights of the Child issued a series of three reports related to unaccompanied children, raising serious concerns on many issues such as the lack of representation for unaccompanied children with regard to access to reception conditions; legal representation before the Court is limited to asylum cases and not reception conditions; the law provides that unaccompanied children and their representative are provided with free legal and procedural information but does not foresee who provides such information; the legal representation provided by the Social Welfare Service is problematic; and the dual role of the Social Welfare Service that acts as a guardian and representative is also considered problematic.
There were no developments in 2020 or in 2021 on the legal representation of UASC, except for the increase in the number of guardians.
 Article 10 Refugee Law.
 Information provided by the Cyprus Refugee Council.
 Information provided by the Cyprus Refugee Council.
 Ombudsman, Intervention regarding the treatment of unaccompanied children, 29 May 2014; Report regarding the system of protection and representation of Unaccompanied Minors, 24 August 2015, 41/2015, available in Greek at: http://bit.ly/1iZeaPB.