Asylum seekers who apply for international protection at the police may be detained for up to 48 hours, without a detention order for safeguarding the first steps of the procedure and a security check.
The detention of asylum seekers is regulated by the Aliens Police Act (FPG), which has been amended several times to specify the grounds for detention. The last amendment entered into force on 1 September 2018. Detention may be ordered by the BFA to secure a return procedure, for example if a “risk of absconding” exists and detention is proportionate. Furthermore, the FPG allows detention according to the Dublin III Regulation.
Since September 2018 asylum seekers can further be detained if they are considered as a threat to the public order or security. The recast Article 76 (2) FPG states: “Detention may only be ordered to enable the issuing of a measure terminating residence, provided that detention is appropriate and that the foreigner’s stay endangers public order or security in accordance with Article 67, and that there is a risk of absconding.”
Article 76 FPG defines the “risk of absconding” on the basis of a number of wide-ranging criteria, namely whether:
- The person has avoided or hampered a deportation order;
1a. The person has not complied with the obligation to obtain a travel document for his or her removal;
- The person has violated a travel ban;
- An enforceable expulsion order exists and the person has absconded during the asylum procedure or during the removal procedure;
- The person makes a subsequent application without right to remain;
- The person is in pre-deportation detention at the time he or she lodges the application;
- It is likely that another country is responsible under the Dublin Regulation, namely as the person has lodged multiple applications, tried to travel to another member state, or it can be assumed that, based on past behaviour he or she intends to travel on to another member state;
- The person does not comply with alternatives to detention;
- The person does not comply with residence restrictions, reporting duties and designated accommodation or similar instructions;
- There is a sufficient link with Austria such as family relations, sufficient resources or secured residence.
The FPG does not refer to a “serious” risk of absconding in line with Article 28(2) of the Dublin III Regulation. However, the long list of criteria in Article 76(3) is non-exhaustive, thereby unduly granting the authorities the discretion to identify a “risk of absconding” and to proceed to detention.
So far, it is difficult to assess the practice of the authorities with regard to the use of detention grounds, as the official statistics do not distinguish between the different detention grounds.
Arrest (i.e. detention without official order) is almost systematic during the 72 hours preceding the transfer of an asylum applicant to the responsible Member State under the Dublin Regulation.
In the detention centres of Vordernberg and Vienna, the numbers of detentions have doubled in 2017 and have further increased in 2018. Observations from NGOs in 2019 show that the number of EU citizens from Eastern Europe (e.g. Slovakia, Hungary) held in detention centres have grown significantly over the past years.
 Article 76(3) FPG.
 Article 76(3)(1a) FPG, in force as of 1 November 2017, citing Article 46(2)-(2a) FPG.
 Article 76(3)(8) FPG, in force as of 1 November 2017.
 Ministry of Interior, Answer to a parliamentary request, 15 November 2018, available in German at: https://bit.ly/2tPKUm6.