Safe country of origin

The Constitution defines as safe countries of origin the countries ‘in which, on the basis of their laws, enforcement practices and general political conditions, it can be safely concluded that neither political persecution nor inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment exists’.[1]

List of safe countries of origin

Member states of the European Union are by definition considered to be safe countries of origin.[2] The list of safe countries of origin is an addendum to the law and has to be adopted by the parliament and the Bundesrat. If the situation in a safe country of origin changes and it can no longer be considered to be safe within the meaning of the law, the Federal Government may issue a decree to remove this country from the list for a period of 6 months. In 2023, Georgia and Moldova have been added to the list of safe countries of origin.[3]

As of 2024, the list of safe countries consists of:

• The member states of the European Union,
• Ghana;
• Senegal;
• Serbia;
• North Macedonia;
• Bosnia-Herzegovina;
• Albania;
• Kosovo;
• Montenegro
• Georgia

Serbia, North Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina were added to the list following the entry into force of a law on 6 November 2014.[4] Albania, Kosovo and Montenegro were added with another law which took effect on 24 October 2015.[5] As explained in the previous updates of this report, several bills were tabled with the aim to add certain countries to the list of safe countries (such as Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia in April 2016) or Georgia in 2018 but the draft bill was removed from the Bundesrat’s agenda in February 2019 as it became obvious that it would be rejected again.[6] The bill was not reintroduced again before the federal elections of September 2021. In 2023, the discussion on safe countries of origin resurfaced, and led to heated discussions among the governing parties, as well as between the government and the opposition. The oppositional party Christian Democrats (CDU) claims that also other North African states such as e.g., Algeria and Tunisia should be recognised as safe countries of origin. In December 2023, the standing conference of Ministers of Interior and Senators of the state adopted a resolution to include Armenia, India and the Maghreb states to the list of safe countries of origin.[7] However, the Federal government only included Moldova and Georgia to the list. The governing party The Greens (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) voiced concern to the concept of safe third countries as such but in the end consented nevertheless to the decision to include Moldova and Georgia to the list.[8] The opposition party The Left and several NGOs questioned the safety in both countries (in Moldova, issues of widespread discrimination against Roma people; in Georgie, issues of backlash to democracy and rule of law, and lack of respect for LBGTQI rights).[9] In contrast, in 2024, the debate surrounding the designation of “safe countries of origin” was not directly reintroduced but remained part of the broader conversation about migration restrictions, asylum law, and deportations. One of the new and pressing demands that emerged was the potential resumption of deportations to Afghanistan, a topic reignited following a violent incident in Mannheim where a police officer was killed.[10] This led to renewed discussions about the possibility of deporting individuals to Afghanistan highlighting the ongoing political divisions over how to handle deportations to conflict-ridden regions.[11]

Since 2015, the Federal Government has to issue a report every two years to determine whether the requirements to be designated a safe country of origin continue to apply, based on the political and legal situation in each country as well as the practical enforcement of existing laws. The last such report was published in March 2024, and concluded that all eight countries continue to fulfil the requirements. The report does not mention the December 2023 additions that were Georgia and Moldova yet as it only reports about the situation in the respective countries between October 2021 and October 2023.[12] NGOs however regularly criticise the designation of some of the countries on the list.[13]

Procedural consequences

Applications of asylum seekers from safe countries of origin shall be considered as manifestly unfounded, unless the applicant presents facts or evidence which justify the conclusion that they might be persecuted in spite of the general situation in the country of origin.

Since March 2016, accelerated procedures can be carried out for applicants from safe countries of origin. However, this is only possible in branch offices of the BAMF to which a ‘special reception centre’ has been assigned, and in 2020 the procedure was applied in comparatively few cases, and only in arrival centres or AnkER centres in Bavaria and North Rhine-Westphalia (see Accelerated procedure).

The number of applications from asylum seekers from safe countries of origin significantly decreased in recent years and have remained on a low level since 2018. This notwithstanding, the BAMF received a total of 2,817 asylum applications from North Macedonia in 2024 . 3,514 individuals from Georgia applied for asylum in 2024. Neither North Macedonia, nor Georgia was among the top 10 countries of origin for asylum applications in 2024, whereas both were in the top 10 in 2023.

The following table shows statistics for asylum applications by relevant nationalities:

Source: BAMF, Asylgeschäftsstatistik (statistics on applications, decisions and pending procedures), available in German at: https://bit.ly/3rnIEzR (2020), https://bit.ly/3goPTTa (2021), https://bit.ly/3IMppKK (2022) https://bit.ly/3UjFWf0 (2023) and here (2024).

It should be noted that many asylum applications of persons from safe countries of origin are subsequent applications. In 2024, subsequent applications from North Macedonia and Moldova for example, represented a significant portion of the total asylum applications by those nationals in Germany. Out of 5,999 applications from North Macedonia, 1,406 were subsequent, accounting for approximately 23.4% of the total applications. Similarly, out of 2,230 applications from Moldova, 1,472 were subsequent, making up 66.1% of the total applications from the country. Hence the number of newly arriving asylum seekers from these countries is considerably lower than the numbers provided above.

To illustrate the developments of protection rates of ‘safe countries of origin’, the following table includes decisions on first applications from Albania, Serbia and North Macedonia. The figures include all cases in which refugee status, subsidiary protection or (national) humanitarian protection / a removal ban was granted:

Source: BAMF, Antrags-, Entscheidungs- und Bestandsstatistik, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and Asylgeschäftsstatistik (statistics on applications, decisions and pending procedures), 1-12/2019, 1-12-/2020, 1-12-2021, 1-12-2022 and 1-12-2023, available in German at: http://bit.ly/40eORyd BAMF, Asylgeschäftsstatistik Januar-Dezember 2024, available in German here.

[1] Article 16a(3) Basic Law.

[2] Section 29a(2) Asylum Act.

[3] Gesetz zur Bestimmung Georgiens und der Republik Moldau als sichere Herkunftsstaaten, BGBl. I Nr. 382, 22 December 2023, available in German at: https://bit.ly/3vRc9A6.

[4] Gesetz zur Einstufung weiterer Staaten als sichere Herkunftsstaaten und zur Erleichterung des Arbeitsmarktzugangs für Asylbewerber und geduldete Ausländer, BGBl. I, No. 49, 5 November 2014, 1649.

[5] Asylverfahrensbeschleunigungsgesetz, BGBl. I, 23 October 2015, 1722.

[6] Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einstufung der Demokratischen Volksrepublik Algerien, des Königreichs Marokko und der Tunesischen Republik als sichere Herkunftsstaaten, 68/16, available in German at: http://bit.ly/2kSi5CO; Bundesrat, ‘Keine Zustimmung: Gesetz zu sicheren Herkunftsstaaten’, 10 March 2017, available at: http://bit.ly/1owVXpm; Spiegel, ‘Bundesrat verschiebt Abstimmung über sichere Herkunftsländer’, 15 February 2019, available in German at: https://bit.ly/2urOtiw.

[7] Innenministerkonferenz (IMK), Sammlung der zu Veröffentlichung freigegebenen Beschlüsse, 8 December 2023, available in German at: https://bit.ly/3UpXztD, 13.

[8] Tagesschau.de, Moldau und Georgien ja, Maghreb-Staaten nein, 4 September 2023, available in German at: https://bit.ly/42oPzuQ.

[9] Pro Asyl, Stellungnahme zum Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Bestimmung Georgiens und der Republik Moldau als sichere Herkunftsstaaten, 25 August 2023, available in German at: https://bit.ly/3Uimijq; Clara Bünger, Georgien und Moldau dürfen nicht als »sichere Herkunftsstaaten« eingestuft werden!, 12 October 2023, available in German at: https://bit.ly/3vVdl5q.

[10] ZDF, ‚Welche Hürden es für Abschiebungen gibt‘, 5 June 2024, available in German here.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Federal Government, Vierter Bericht zu der Überprüfung der Voraussetzungen zur Einstufung der in Anlage II zum Asylgesetz bezeichneten sicheren Herkunftsstaaten, 20/10750, available in German at: https://tinyurl.com/4aw9pumm.

[13] See for example Flüchtlingsrat Tühringen, Sogenannte “sichere” Herkunftsländer, August 2021, available in German at: http://bit.ly/3JGdXQF; PRO ASYL, Neuer Anlauf für einen rechtswidrigen Gesetzentwurf: Erweiterung der »sicheren Herkunftsländer«, 21 September 2018, available in German at: http://bit.ly/3YR6q6b. Pro Asyl, Was heißt hier sicher? Wie die Innenminister*innen Geflüchtete entrechten wollen, 27 June 2023, available in German at: https://bit.ly/3HDInBn.