Safe country of origin

Sweden

Country Report: Safe country of origin Last updated: 10/06/22

Author

Swedish Refugee Law Center Visit Website

In May 2021, Sweden implemented the APD´s provision regarding safe countries of origin in its national legislation. The legislation process was initiated after the CJEU judgement A v Migrationsverket in July 2018. In the judgement, the CJEU stated that the Migration Agency cannot reject an application as manifestly unfounded with reference to COI stating that the asylum seeker is able to seek state protection, without implementing the provisions regarding safe countries of origin. On 19 June 2019, the government ordered an investigation regarding the possibility of introducing a list of safe countries of origin.  A government memorandum was published on 30 January 2020, which outlined the legislative changes necessary to achieve that aim.[1] On 1 May 2021, the proposed legislation regarding safe countries of origin came into force.

List of safe countries of origin

The Swedish Migration Agency is responsible for establishing the national list of safe countries of origin. On 25 May 2021, the Swedish Migration Agency published a provision (“föreskrift”) designating the following countries as safe countries of origin:[2]

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Georgia
  • Mongolia
  • Albania
  • Chile
  • Kosovo
  • North Macedonia
  • Serbia

The same day the list was published, the Swedish Migration Agency also published new guidelines regarding immediately enforceable returns, including the concept of safe countries of origin.[3] The Swedish Migration Agency also published country information reports for all countries on the national list. The country information reports are relatively short and provide general information about the country in question. A description of the human rights situation and the ability to enjoy state protection in each country is also made. The reports do not provide specific information about how the Swedish Migration Agency made the actual assessment to designate the country in question as safe. No references to the criteria set out in the revised Asylum Procedure Directive are made in the reports.

Application of the concept of safe country of origin

The new Swedish legislation gives the Swedish Migration Agency increased possibilities to use accelerated procedures for asylum seekers from countries on the list. According to the Swedish legislation, the Swedish Migration Agency can expel an asylum seeker who has travelled from a safe country of origin with immediate enforcement, if the asylum application is considered to be manifestly unfounded after an individual assessment. In order to use immediate enforcement, it must also be clear that a residence permit cannot be granted on any other grounds, such as humanitarian reasons or family ties in Sweden. According to Swedish case law, the assessment must be clear and made without more detailed consideration.[4]

A decision to reject an application for a residence permit from an asylum seeker from a safe country of origin can be appealed to the Migration Court and onwards to the Migration Court of Appeal. In an appeal process, the migration courts can grant the asylum seeker a residence permit if it is determined that the country of origin is not safe for the individual in question. The Migration Court can also amend expulsion decisions from being immediately enforceable to regular, if it is determined that the criteria for immediate enforcement are not met. A court decision to merely amend the expulsion decision does not necessarily mean that a residence permit will be granted, just that the decision is not immediately enforceable. Decisions from the SMA to include a specific country on the list of safe countries cannot, however, be appealed.

The Swedish Migration Agency considers that public counsel, as a main rule, should not be appointed when processing asylum applications from safe countries of origin. However, exceptions can be made for people who face special difficulties in exercising their rights.[5] Asylum seekers from safe countries of origin do not usually have the right to work in Sweden while their asylum applications are being processed.

According to a study carried out by The Swedish Refugee Law Center with support from UNHCR[6], 37 decisions with immediate enforcement were made regarding asylum seekers from countries on the list during the first three months after its introduction. During the period under review, decisions with immediate enforcement were made regarding asylum-seekers from four of the countries on the Swedish list of safe countries of origin. Those countries were Georgia (18 decisions), Mongolia (9 decisions), Albania (6 decisions) and Serbia (4 decisions). In the study, 12 of the decisions concerned families with children. A total of 22 children were affected by decisions with immediate enforcement.

In the study, questions were raised about whether the asylum seekers in all cases had had a real chance to rebut the presumption that the country in question was safe. Concerns were also raised since the threshold for considering an application as manifestly unfounded seemed to be lower in cases regarding safe countries of origin than what follows from previous Swedish case-law. It was also noted that public counsel was appointed only in very few cases and that the assessment of children´s own reasons for entitlement to a residence permit, and the best interest of the child, were very standardized in many cases.

 

 

 

[1] Ministry of Justice and Migration, Uppenbart ogrundade ansökningar och fastställande av säkra ursprungsländer Ds 2020:2, 30 January 2020, available in Swedish at: https://bit.ly/3b4MpkN.

[2] Swedish Migration Agency. Migrationsverkets föreskrifter om förteckning över säkra ursprungsländer, MIGRFS 2021:4. Available in Swedish here: https://bit.ly/3qN1h19.

[3] Swedish Migration Agency. Rättsligt ställningstagande RS/071/2021. Avvisning med omedelbar verkställighet till hemlandet inklusive säkra ursprungsländer. Available in Swedish here: https://bit.ly/33UJbky.

[4] See for example Migration Court Of Appeal case no MIG 2006:7,  MIG 2010:22 and MIG 2014:22.

[5] Swedish Migration Agency. Rättsligt ställningstagande RS/071/2021. Avvisning med omedelbar verkställighet till hemlandet inklusive säkra ursprungsländer p. 12-13. Available in Swedish here: https://bit.ly/33UJbky.

[6] Swedish Refugee law Center. Rättsäkerheten och säkra ursprungsländer. Available here in Swedish with an English summary: https://bit.ly/33Ugch5.

Table of contents

  • Statistics
  • Overview of the legal framework
  • Overview of the main changes since the previous report update
  • Asylum Procedure
  • Reception Conditions
  • Detention of Asylum Seekers
  • Content of International Protection
  • ANNEX – I Transposition of the CEAS in national legislation