In Sweden, all asylum applicants used to have access to the benefits of the reception system, giving them the possibility to access housing and a daily allowance. If they have resources, they are required to use these first, as the provision of reception conditions is conditional upon lack of sufficient resources. At the lodging of the asylum application, the Migration Agency reception officer enquires about the applicant’s financial situation.
Daily allowance should only be paid to a foreigner who does not have his own funds. An individual assessment must be made. If the alien has or obtains access to cash, bank deposits, or other assets that are easily converted into cash and cash equivalents, they must primarily use these for their livelihood. Also the foreigner's ability to use any assets that exist in another country for their daily life should be taken into account. In other words, needs testing shall take into account such income from gainful employment or other income or own assets or own resources which the alien himself has at his disposal. Such an individual needs test is a prerequisite for the application of the provisions on reduction of the daily allowance.
Following an amendment to the Reception of Asylum Seekers Act (LMA) introduced in 2016 some applicants no longer have the right to reception conditions. Applicants who have received a decision on refusal of entry or deportation which can no longer be appealed, or whose period for voluntary return has ended, lose their right to reception conditions i.e. the right to a daily allowance and accommodation provided by the Migration Agency. If they refuse to leave their accommodation at that point, they may be forcibly removed and be subject to criminal sanctions. Consequently, many persons in this situation are left destitute and homeless or reliant on support from individuals or civil society organisations. In cases where it is considered “obviously unreasonable” to cease the right to reception conditions, the right to such conditions will not cease and particularly vulnerable persons can therefore be exempted.
Subsequent applicants who are adults are not able to get subsidised health care or medicines. Although they always the right to emergency health care (health care that cannot be deferred, maternal healthcare, healthcare related to abortion and health care in relation to contraception). If subsequent applicants are comprised of a family with children, they are entitled to a reduced allowance as adults but standard allowance for children and have a right to accommodation. These restrictive changes have led to criticism from civil society, as organisations such as the Red Cross have pointed out that the reform has led more people to turn to civil society organisations to ask for assistance with accommodation, food and health care.
Section 17, Law on Reception of Asylum Seekers and Others, 1994:137.
 Section 15, Law on Reception of Asylum Seekers and Others, 1994:137.
 Sections 11-12a, Law on Reception of Asylum Seekers and Others, 1994:137.
 Sections 11, Law on Reception of Asylum Seekers and Others, 1994:137.
 Section 7, Law (2013: 407) on health care for certain foreigners staying in Sweden without the necessary permits (Lag (2013:407) om hälso- och sjukvård till vissa utlänningar som vistas i Sverige utan nödvändiga tillstånd).
 Sections 11-12a, Law on Reception of Asylum Seekers and Others, 1994:137. Swedish Red Cross, Consequences of the amendment to Sweden’s Reception of Asylum Seekers Act, 2016, available in Swedish at: http://bit.ly/2Fw1wr7; VSIU, Report about Legal Uncertainties in the Asylum Process For Unaccompanied Minors in Sweden, 26 February 2018, available at: http://bit.ly/2FEuiD2; Rapport om rättsosäkerhet i asylprocessen för ensamkommande barn och unga, September 2017, available in Swedish at: http://bit.ly/2C5QySC.