Differential treatment of specific nationalities in the procedure


Country Report: Differential treatment of specific nationalities in the procedure Last updated: 03/06/21


According to Article 12(2-bis) of the Procedure Decree, the CNDA may designate countries for the nationals of which the personal interview can be omitted, on the basis that subsidiary protection can be granted (see Regular Procedure: Personal Interview). Currently, the CNDA has not yet designated such countries.

The issue, on 4 October 2019, of the Safe Country of Origin decree, has directly affected the treatment and prerogatives of asylum seekers whose nationalities are indicated by the decree, also because of the CNDA directive to consider all rejections as manifestly unfounded applications.

Statistics on decisions in asylum applications in 2020 show a recognition rate of about 93% for Afghans, 91 % for Venezuelans, 77% for Somalis , 59% for Iraqis. And 58% for people coming from El Salvador. As for 2019, Syrians do not appear in the 2020 statistics among the main countries of origin of asylum seekers.

In practice, as already highlighted in Hotspots and Registration, some nationalities face more difficulties to access the asylum procedure, both at hotspots and at Questure. In the hotspots, ASGI has directly recorded in 2020, as in 2019, that people from Tunisia were notified expulsion orders despite having expressly requested international protection.[1]



[1]           CNDA, Statistics 2020, available at : https://bit.ly/2R7FRN3

Table of contents

  • Statistics
  • Overview of the legal framework
  • Overview of the main changes since the previous report update
  • Asylum Procedure
  • Reception Conditions
  • Detention of Asylum Seekers
  • Content of International Protection
  • ANNEX I – Transposition of the CEAS in national legislation