National legislation provides that UNHCR shall have access to asylum applicants, including those in detention and in airport or port transit zones. Moreover, the law also states that a person seeking asylum in Malta shall be informed of his right to contact UNHCR. There is no provision in the law with respect to access to asylum applicants by NGOs, however, it states that legal advisers who assist applicants for asylum shall have access to closed areas such as detention facilities and transit zones for the purpose of consulting the applicant. Thus, NGOs have indirect access to asylum applicants through lawyers who work for them. In practice, however, asylum seekers located far from the centre or in closed centres do not face major obstacles in accessing NGOs and UNHCR.
Access to the IRC is regulated by AWAS and is not granted to family members or NGOs on grounds of the medical clearance conducted in this facility. However, access to the open section of the IRC is granted to UNHCR and one NGO.
Specific NGOs have not been granted access to open reception centres for the purpose of meeting asylum applicants.
Since all applicants arriving irregularly in Malta were detained, access to detention became a priority for UNHCR and NGOs. While UNHCR was always granted access, NGOs were limited in accessing detention facilities on several occasions. For example, access was revoked after two leading NGOs filed Habeas Corpus cases which led to the acknowledgment of the unlawfulness of detention and the release of several applicants. Access was then denied for NGOs for several weeks without any explanation.
Moreover, the authorities are limiting the possibility for NGOs to provide information to a large group of people. Lawyers or social workers are only allowed to meet with their individual clients.
 Regulation 16(a) Procedural Regulations.
 Regulation 3(3)(c) Declaration Regulations.