Safe country of origin

Author

PIC Visit Website

The concept of the safe country of origin is defined in Article 61 IPA. A third country is designated as safe in case it can be concluded, based on the legal situation, the application of the law within the democratic system and the general political circumstances, that there is no general and consistent persecution, torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the country and no threat of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict.[1]

According to the law, a country is declared a safe country of origin by the Government of the Republic of Slovenia based on a proposal of the Ministry of the Interior, which regularly monitors the situation in relevant countries of origin through the information gathered by other EU Member States, EU institutions and other relevant international organisations.[2]

If the Ministry deems that conditions regarding the human rights situation have deteriorated considerably, or if it doubts that the country is still fulfilling the abovementioned conditions relating to safety, it can re-examine whether the country can still be considered safe. If it is concluded that the country can no longer be considered a safe country of origin, the Ministry of the Interior can make a proposal to the Government to remove it from the list of safe countries of origin.[3]

The Government notifies the European Commission about the declaration of a country as a safe country of origin and about potential subsequent changes in that regards.[4]

A third country can be considered a safe country of origin in an individual case if the applicant has citizenship or, in case the applicant is a stateless person, they had habitual residence in the country and failed to prove that it cannot be considered a safe country of origin due to their own specific circumstances. In this case, the competent authority can reject the applicant’s claim for international protection as manifestly unfounded under an Accelerated Procedure.[5]

The Government issued its first List of Safe Countries of Origin in February 2016.[6]  In April 2022, the Government amended the Ordinance and again added Türkiye to the safe country of origin list together with Ghana and Gambia. Therefore Albania, Algeria, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Egypt, Gambia, Georgia, Ghana, Kosovo, Morocco, Nepal, Senegal, North Macedonia, Serbia, Tunisia and Türkiye were determined as safe countries of origin by the Government.[7]

In 2024 a total 4,478 nationals of countries designated as safe countries of origin applied for asylum in Slovenia: 

Source: Official statistics of the Migration directorate available here.

In comparison to 2023, when 6,433 applications from applicants from a ‘safe country of origin’ were lodged, the number of these applications decreased in 2023. This is mostly due to the general decrease of applicants in 2023.

In 2024, the concept of ‘safe country of origin’ was used in practice.[8] However, since there are no considerable differences between a regular and an accelerated procedure, and since an applicant who is considered to come from a safe country of origin can still provide evidence that the country in question is not safe for them, the safe country of origin principle does not have strong practical implications.

If the concept is used, the application can only be rejected in the accelerated procedure as manifestly unfounded.[9] In practice, applications are not rejected solely based on a ‘safe country of origin’ concept but together with other reasons for rejecting the application as manifestly unfounded.[10]

[1]           Article 61(1) IPA.

[2]           Article 61(3) IPA.

[3]           Ibid.

[4]           Article 61(4) IPA.

[5]           Article 62(1)-(2) IPA.

[6]           Article 1 of the Ordinance determining the list of safe countries of origin, Official Gazette of RS, No. 13/16.

[7]           Ordinance determining the list of safe countries of origin, Official Gazette of RS, No. 47/22.

[8]           Observation by the PIC.

[9]           Article 63(4) IPA.

[10]          Observation by the PIC.