Content of International Protection


Country Report: Content of International Protection Last updated: 19/04/23


Hungarian Helsinki Committee Visit Website

Since June 2016, the Hungarian state has completely withdrawn integration services provided to beneficiaries of international protection, thus leaving recognised refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection to destitution and homelessness. Only non- and intergovernmental and church-based organisations provide services aimed at integration such as housing, language courses, assistance with finding employment, or with family reunification.[1] However, their capacities are seriously limited and cannot provide for all. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic further aggravated the already existing problems and difficulties for beneficiaries of international protection in the absence of integration and support programmes. In 2022, accessing the available solutions became even more difficult for the system being overburdened by the Ukrainian refugee flow.

The Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe pointed out in her 2019 report that xenophobic rhetoric and attitudes in Hungary have a harmful effect on the integration of recognised refugees.[2] According to a comparative report on refugee integration frameworks in 14 EU Member States from 2019 among east-central European countries, Hungary provides the least advantageous integration policy framework. As for the authors, this is due to deliberate policy choices.[3]

In June 2019, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination recommended that Hungary take all immediate measures to stop racist hate speech and incitement to violence against, among others, asylum seekers, refugees and migrants. The Committee was particularly alarmed by racist and discriminatory statements made by public figures, with more power to promote racial hatred.[4] The Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants remarked that journalists from local media helped fuelling xenophobia and anti-migration attitudes in Hungary.[5] The UNHCR raised similar concerns. According to the organisation, ‘the Government of Hungary has been systematically pursuing an anti-refugee rhetoric over the years. In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and other senior government officials have on several occasions asserted that foreigners and migrants are to blame for the arrival of the pandemic in Hungary. This rhetoric has fuelled xenophobia, ethnic and racial hatred including by associating immigration and refugees with terrorism, by vilifying refugees and migrants as a threat to the country.’[6]

Keeping in mind the complete withdrawal of the state from the integration of beneficiaries of international protection, we discuss the content of international protection as follows.


A. Status and residence

  1. Residence permit
  2. Civil registration
  3. Long-term residence
  4. Naturalisation
  5. Cessation and review of protection status
  6. Withdrawal of protection status

B. Family reunification

  1. Criteria and conditions
  2. Status and rights of family members

C. Movement and mobility

  1. Freedom of movement
  2. Travel documents

D. Housing

E. Employment and education

  1. Access to the labour market
  2. Access to education

F. Social welfare

G. Health care




[1] HHC, Two years after: What’s Left of Refugee Protection in Hungary?, September 2017, available at:

[2] CoE-CommDH – Council of Europe – Commissioner for Human Rights: Commission for Human Rights of the Council of Europe Dunja Mijatović; Report following her visit to Hungary from 4 to 8 February 2019, 21 May 2019, available at:

[3] Wolffhardt et al., The European benchmark for refugee reintegration: A comparative analysis of the National Integration Evaluation Mechanism in 14 EU countries, 2019,, 10.

[4] Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Concluding observations on the combined eighteenth to twenty-fifth periodic reports of Hungary, CERD/C/HUN/CO/18-25, 6 June 2019, available at:

[5] UN Human Rights Council, Compilation on Hungary; Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights [A/HRC/WG.6/39/HUN/2], 25 August 2021, available at:

[6] UNHCR, Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees; For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights’ Compilation Report; Universal Periodic Review: 3rd Cycle, 39th Session; Hungary, February 2021, available at:

Table of contents

  • Statistics
  • Overview of the legal framework
  • Overview of the main changes since the previous report update
  • Asylum Procedure
  • Reception Conditions
  • Detention of Asylum Seekers
  • Content of International Protection
  • ANNEX I – Transposition of the CEAS in national legislation