Since June 2016, the Hungarian state has completely withdrawn integration services provided to beneficiaries of international protection, thus leaving recognised refugees and beneficiaries of subsidiary protection to destitution and homelessness. Only non-governmental and church-based organisations provide services aimed at integration such as housing, language courses, assistance with finding an employment, or regarding family reunification. However, their capacities are seriously limited and cannot provide for all.
The Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe pointed out in her 2019 report that xenophobic rhetoric and attitudes in Hungary have a harmful effect on the integration of recognised refugees. Even though the general migration strategy adopted in 2013 called for the creation of a tolerant Hungarian host society, the strategy has never been materialised. According to a comparative report on refugee integration frameworks in 14 EU Member States from 2019 among east-central European countries Hungary provides the least advantageous integration policy framework. As for the authors this is due to deliberate policy choices.
Keeping in mind the complete withdrawal of the state from the integration of beneficiaries of international protection, we discuss the content of international protection as follows:
A. Status and residence
- Residence permit
- Civil registration
- Long-term residence
- Cessation and review of protection status
- Withdrawal of protection status
B. Family reunification
C. Movement and mobility
E. Employment and education
G. Health care
 CoE-CommDH – Council of Europe – Commissioner for Human Rights: Commission for Human Rights of the Council of Europe Dunja Mijatović; Report following her visit to Hungary from 4 to 8 February 2019, 21 May 2019, available at: http://bit.ly/2TemwbJ.
 Wolffhardt A., Conte C. and Huddleston T., The European Benchmark For Refugee Integration: A comparative analysis of the national integration evaluation mechanism in 14 EU countries, Migration Policy Group and Institute of Public Affairs, 2019, available at: https://bit.ly/39gJDrc, 159.
 Wolffhardt et al. 2019, 49.
 Wolffhardt et al. 2019, 10.