Access to detention facilities


Country Report: Access to detention facilities Last updated: 30/11/20



Under Article 68(8) LFIP, detained applicants for international protection will be provided opportunities to meet with their legal representatives, UNHCR officials and notaries. The law, however, fails to make explicit reference to the right of detained applicants to meet with NGO representatives. It is considered that this deliberate absence is meant to limit or deny detained applicants’ access to NGO legal counsellors, which must be seen as an arbitrary reduction of the safeguard in Article 68 LFIP.

Detained applicants may also receive visitors. In this regard, all visits will be subject to permission. Visits to detained applicants at border premises are subject to permission from the Vice-Governor’s Office in charge of the border gate. Visits to detained applicants in other facilities are subject to the permission of the DGMM official in charge of the facility. Request for visiting a detained applicant may be turned down where the “applicant’s condition and the general circumstances are not suitable”. This vague formulation raises concerns that arbitrary restrictions may be imposed on visitors’ access to the centres.

Detention authorities shall determine the duration of the approved meetings and visits. On the other hand, they are required to take measures to ensure confidentiality of the encounters.


Access of lawyers to Removal Centres


According to an unpublished DGMM Circular of 17 December 2015, lawyers are only granted access to Removal Centres on the basis of written requests,[1] and can only request a copy of documents deemed not to be confidential, provided they have a power of attorney.[2]

This practice changed in 2019 and lawyers were able to visit their clients in many removal centres without showing a power of attorney or written request. This was not the case in Izmir, Kirikkale or the new removal centre in Ankara, however.

In Izmir the removal centre management still required power of attorney to let the lawyers in to have a pre-meeting with their potential clients. Even though according to Code on Lawyers, lawyers have the right to meet with their potential clients without it.[3] Lawyers have been also subjected to long delays and security checks including X-ray body searches before being able to interview clients.[4] More generally, there have been allegations that detainees have not been allowed to meet with lawyers even where lawyers request to access them by name.[5] Complaints against security guards have also been filed by lawyers.[6]

In the new removal centre in Ankara, the removal centre does not accept lawyers after 17.00. Lawyers have difficulties examining the files of their potential clients. The removal centre management asks for power of attorney to examine the files however Ankara PDMM has offered to assist in solving this issue. The removal centre is located far away from the centre and the only transportation is by car or taxi.[7]

In Kirikkale the removal centre is also far away from the city centre. Requests for a legal aid lawyer are not delivered to the bar association from the removal centre authority, which requests a power of attorney from the lawyer to access the removal centre. Requests for assistance are mainly received through the family members of the detained refugee or UNHCR.[8]

Harmandalı Removal Centre management in Izmir does not report requests from refugees for legal aid to the lawyers directly. Lawyers become aware of the request through their relatives or by coincidence. Lawyers have also complained to Izmir PDMM about physical limitations in the removal centre, such as unlawful body searches targeting lawyers.[9] In 2019 lawyers from the Izmir Bar Association of Izmir were arbitrarily detained in the Harmandalı Removal Centre during a visit to meet with asylum seekers.[10] A group of lawyers is preparing a lawsuit against the unlawful treatment of lawyers in the removal centre.[11] There have been other reports of restrictions for legal aid lawyers such as not letting the lawyer  examine the personal file of the refugee or banning the lawyer from reading all documents in the file or prohibiting the lawyer from the client-lawyer meeting. This is a worrying issue since now the time limit to appeal deportation is seven days, meaning there are only seven days to contact their lawyer, collect all relevant data and file the lawsuit. In addition, if a lawyer does not accept a body search, requests to see their client are not accepted or they have to wait long hours in the removal centre. It seems that young lawyers in particular are subject to these unlawful practices.[12]

In 2019 lawyers were also subject to searches in Antep and Van removal centres.[13]

In Van removal centre the first person to deal with the lawyer is a gendarmerie or koy korucusu (‘village guard”) who can create problems especially for young lawyers such as unlawful body checks or prohibiting them from client-lawyer meetings. It is possible for lawyers to use the Union of Bar Association’s translation service through a fix line in the removal centre. There is no translator in the removal centre.[14]

Lawyers’ access to the removal centre in Antakya was better in 2019 compared to 2018.[15]

Where the lawyer does not provide a sworn interpreter, the management of the centre usually relies on other detainees to provide interpretation, a practice which raises questions vis-à-vis the confidentiality of interviews in Removal Centres.[16] Arabic-speaking staff of the centre provide interpretation assistance to lawyers when needed.[17] In Izmir lawyers need to bring their own interpreter who has to be under oath. There is a fixed line to use the translation service provided by the Turkish Bar Association but the fixed line is not in the lawyers’ meeting room but in a migration officer’s room which is one floor above lawyer-client meeting room, meaning lawyers and their clients cannot benefit from it.[18]

In Istanbul NGO lawyers can access removal centres without submitting power of attorney but they usually wait for a long time. There are four detention centres in Istanbul: Selimpasa, Binkilic, Tuzla and Pendik. Tuzla and Pendik have been recently activated. Kumkapi and Vatan Police Stations in Istanbul are also used. This means that when a legal aid lawyer receives an appointment through the legal aid service, the lawyer has to check these six locations to find out where the client is. Police officers can reportedly give misleading information to lawyers in order to prevent them accessing their client. Kumkapi and Vatan Police Stations are not lawyer-friendly places. Lawyers could not even enter the Vatan Police Station building without submitting a power of attorney in August 2019. It is more accessible now but there is always a very long queue. For legal aid lawyers, access to removal centres is very difficult if they have no car. They are 60 km away from the centre. The current legal aid project does not always cover transportation costs. Lawyers are not always willing to accept appointments on refugee law cases because it takes at least 3 hours to access removal centres.[19]

In Kayseri, lawyers have reported having full access to the Removal Centre and benefitting from a separate room for meetings with clients; previously Removal Centre staff was present during meetings but this practice has now stopped.[20] In Antalya, a security guard is present during lawyer / client meetings if the person has been issued a YTS code.[21] In Gaziantep, lawyers’ access to the centre improved in 2018 as waiting times for entering the facility have been reduced.[22]

Lawyers entering Removal Centres such as Izmir (Harmandalı), Hatay, Adana or Mersin are only allowed to see their clients in highly secured meeting rooms equipped with cameras.[23] In Izmir there are now separate rooms with one table and chairs specifically allocated for lawyers and their clients but they are monitored by cameras.[24] Lawyers can take notes of the meeting. In Gaziantep, a room for meetings with lawyers is currently under construction.[25] In some centres the meeting room doors are open, thereby not guaranteeing confidentiality.

Lawyers’ access to detained clients is often hindered by transfers of detainees between Removal Centres without notifying their legal representative or the family members.[26] In 2018, lawyers were aware of persons pressured to sign voluntary return documents to avoid transfer to a Removal Centre located far away from their family members.[27]

Lawyers’ access to airports was restricted in recent years but this improved overall in 2019.[28] There is now a new airport in Istanbul which is called Istanbul Airport. Conditions in the new airport for migrants who are not allowed to enter in Turkey is better than the old airport, Atatürk Airport. There is a unit of the PDMM in the airport and lawyers can easily access case files. This is new and good practice. The main problems are accessing notaries and the long distance between the airport and the centre. In 2019, there were no legal aid request from airports where migrants were kept waiting at airports for a long time. Now, people who are not allowed to enter in Turkey are sent back to their countries or a safe third country immediately.[29]


Access of UNHCR and NGOs to Removal Centres


The Removal Centres Regulation does not expressly regulate the conditions upon which UNHCR and NGOs have access to Removal Centres.

In practice, UNHCR does not have unhindered access to Removal Centres but has developed working modalities with DGMM. In 2018 this meant UNHCR submitted requests to visit Removal Centres on a periodic basis. UNHCR visited the premises, observed procedures and provided recommendations.[30]

NGOs have no established protocols with DGMM for access to Removal Centres.[31] As regards access to and contact with family members, practice varies across the centres. In Gaziantep, detainees can call family members for a maximum of 15 minutes two days a week, while in Hatay they can call every day. Family visits are more restricted in Gaziantep.[32]


[1] According to UNHCR, this procedure is established with a view to ensuring that persons accessing the centres are accredited lawyers and does not constitute a violation of the right to a lawyer: Information provided by UNHCR, February 2018.

[2] DGMM Circular No 31386081-000-36499 of 17 December 2015 “Avukatların Ggm’Ierdeki Yabancılarla Görüşme Talebi”.

[3] Information provided by a lawyer from the Izmir Bar Association, February 2020.

[4] Information provided by a lawyer of the Izmir Bar Association, March 2019. See also Human Rights Association, ‘İzmir Harmandalı Geri Gönderme Merkezi Hakkında Gözlem Raporu’, 9 July 2017, available in Turkish at:

[5] Council of Europe Special Representative for Migration and Refugees, Report of the fact-finding visit to Turkey, 10 August 2016, para IV.2.

[6] Information provided by a lawyer of the Izmir Bar Association, March 2019.

[7] Information provided by a lawyer from the Ankara Bar Association, March 2020.

[8] Information provided by a stakeholder, February 2020.

[9] Information provided by a lawyer from the Izmir Bar Association, February 2020.

[10]ECRE, ‘Turkey: Lawyers Arbitrarily Detained in Izmir Removal Centre’, 31 May 2019, available at:

[11]Information provided by a lawyer from the Izmir Bar Association, February 2020.

[12]Information provided by a lawyer from the Izmir Bar Association March 2020.

[13] Information provided by a stakeholder in Gaziantep, February 2020.

[14] Information provided by a lawyer from the Van Bar Association, March 2020.

[15] Information provided by a lawyer from the Antakya Bar Association March 2020.

[16] Information provided by a stakeholder, February 2019.

[17] Information provided by a lawyer of the Kayseri Bar Association, February 2019; a lawyer of the Antakya Bar Association, March 2019.

[18] Information provided by a lawyer from the Izmir Bar Association, February 2020.

[19] Information provided by a lawyer from the Istanbul Bar Association, February 2020.

[20] Information provided by a lawyer of the Kayseri Bar Association, February 2019.

[21]Information provided by a lawyer of the Antalya Bar Association, March 2019.

[22] Information provided by a lawyer of the Gaziantep Bar Association, February 2019.

[23] Grand National Assembly, İzmir-Aydın Geri Gönderme Merkezleri İnceleme Raporu, November 2017, 20.

[24] Information provided by a lawyer from the Izmir Bar Association, February 2020.

[25] Information provided by a lawyer of the Gaziantep Bar Association, February 2019; an NGO, February 2019.

[26] Information provided by NGOs, February 2019; a lawyer of the Antakya Bar Association, March 2019.

[27] Information provided by a lawyer of the Antakya Bar Association, March 2019.

[28] Information provided by an NGO, February 2019; International Refugee Rights Association, February 2019.

[29] Information provided by a lawyer from Istanbul Bar Association, February 2020.

[30] Information provided by UNHCR, February 2019.

[31] Information provided by SGDD-ASAM, February 2018.

[32]Information provided by a lawyer of the Antakya Bar Association, February 2018.


Table of contents

  • Statistics
  • Overview of the legal framework
  • Overview of main changes since the previous report update
  • Introduction to the asylum context in Turkey
  • Asylum Procedure
  • Reception Conditions
  • Detention of Asylum Seekers
  • Content of International Protection
  • Temporary Protection Regime
  • Content of Temporary Protection