Author
The LITP lays down the grounds for restricting the freedom of movement of applicants and foreigners under transfer, including through detention in a Reception Centre for Foreigners.[1] 2023 amendments to the LITP introduced new grounds for applying restrictions on the movement of applicants, thus making the law stricter in this respect. Detention may be ordered for seven reasons,[2] if it is established by individual assessment that other measures (see section on Alternatives to Detention) would not achieve the purpose of restriction of freedom of movement:
- establishing the facts and circumstances on which the application for international protection is based, and that cannot be established without the restriction of movement, especially if it is assessed that there is a risk of absconding;
- establishing and verifying identity or nationality;
- protection of the national security or public order of the Republic of Croatia;
- in order to prevent the spread of infectious diseases in accordance with national regulations on necessary epidemiological measures;
- to prevent endangering the life of persons and property;
- due to multiple consecutive attempts to leave the Republic of Croatia during the procedure for international protection;
- due to the implementation of the procedure for forced removal, if based on objective circumstances, taking into account that the applicant already had the possibility of starting the procedure for international protection, it is justifiably assumed that by seeking international protection applicant wants to delay or make difficult to execute the decision on expulsion and/or return made in accordance with the provisions of the Law on foreigners.
In practice, however, detention is not used systematically.
Moreover, Article 54 (3) explicitly provides for the possibility to restrict freedom of movement or detain a foreigner for the purposes of transfer to another Member State under the Dublin Regulation only in cases where there is a “risk of absconding”. However, it should be noted that the LITP does not refer to a “significant risk of absconding” in accordance with Article 28(2) of the Dublin III Regulation.
The existence of a “risk of absconding” is determined on the basis of all the facts and circumstances of the concrete case, especially with regard to:[3]
- Previous attempts to arbitrarily leave Republic of Croatia;
- Refusal to submit to verification and establishment of identity;
- Concealing or providing false information on the identity and/or nationality;
- Violation of the reception centre’s house rules;
- A Eurodac ‘hit; and
- Opposition to a Dublin transfer.
As for the legal basis for detention in 2025, the majority of decisions were issued on the grounds of protecting national security or public order (for a total of 46 individuals), most of whom were accommodated in the Reception Centre for Foreigners in Ježevo.[4]
In practice, detention is rarely used during the Dublin procedure. According to the MoI, in 2025, for the purpose of implementing a Dublin transfer, and based on Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 604/2013, Croatia used detention in one case during 2025 to ensure the transfer of a person to another Member State, as it was assessed that there was a risk of absconding.[5]
The LITP specifies that detention in Reception Centre for Foreigners may be imposed if, by individual assessment, it is established that other measures would not achieve the purpose of restriction of freedom of movement.[6] However, attorneys at law and Centre for Peace Studies reported that decisions on the restriction of freedom of movement do not contain a thorough and reasoned individual assessment.[7]
The Centre for Peace Studies[8] reported on an activist who applied for international protection and who was detained in Croatia for more than 100 days for speaking out against the work of the Security and Intelligence Agency, and faced charges of violating the Law on Offenses Against Public Order and Peace. The Administrative Court found no irregularities in the ordering of the detention. In cooperation with the Centre for Peace Studies and attorney at law, the applicant for international protection subsequently filed an appeal with the High Administrative Court, arguing that the detention was arbitrary, unfounded, and unreasoned. In the proceedings, the High Administrative Court upheld these claims, emphasizing that there had been a lack of an individual assessment of all the circumstances of the specific case, including a failure to establish that the legitimate aim (i.e., the protection of public order, could not be achieved through the application of less restrictive measures). Due to this deficiency, the court quashed the first-instance decision, thereby confirming that the detention had been arbitrary.[9]
According to information provided by the Ministry of Interior in 2017, the individual assessment requested for the purpose of the restriction of freedom of movement is done based on personal circumstances such as belonging to vulnerable group (unaccompanied child, person with disability, health problems, family relations) as well as based on the behaviour of the applicant for international protection and their attitude towards the House Rules of the Reception Centre for Applicants for International Protection.[10]
Where a person expresses the intention to apply for international protection from the detention centre, after having been detained on the basis of one of the immigration detention grounds as specified by the Law on foreigners in the Reception Centre for Foreigners, they must either be released and transferred to an open centre (Zagreb or Kutina) or must be served with a new restriction of freedom of movement decision on one of the grounds for detention as specified by LITP. According to information from the Border Police Directorate in 2018, if the intention is expressed in the Reception Centre for Foreigners in Ježevo, the intention is then received by the centre, which then informs by email the service dealing with applicants for international protection about the intention to seek international protection. The Service for Reception and accommodation of applicants for international protection organises the lodging of the application for international protection on the first following working day and, depending on the assessment, issues the decision on the restriction of freedom of movement, i.e., a detention order. If the decision on the restriction of freedom of movement is not issued, the applicant would be moved to the Reception Centre for Applicants for International Protection. Intentions to apply for international protection that are expressed in the Transit Reception Centres in Trilj and Tovarnik are received by local police stations based on their territorial jurisdiction.[11] However no new information is available since 2018.
In 2025, persons detained in the Reception Centre for Foreigners contacted the Centre for Peace Studies (CPS) on several occasions, and declared not being able to access the asylum system. Only after CPS’ intervention were these people registered as applicants for international protection. The Centre for Peace Studies also reported that during 2025, they received information on pressure being exerted on persons who had lodged an application for international protection to withdraw their applications, either to avoid detention or to be released from an already ordered detention.[12]
[1] Article 54(5) LITP.
[2] Article 54(2) LITP.
[3] Article 54(4) LITP.
[4] Croatian Law Centre: The Croatian Asylum System in 2025- National Report; available at: https://www.hpc.hr/en/2026/06/17/2025-national-asylum-system-report/
[5] Croatian Law Centre: The Croatian Asylum System in 2025- National Report; available at: https://www.hpc.hr/en/2026/06/17/2025-national-asylum-system-report/
[6] Article 54(6) LITP.
[7 Information provided by attorneys at law, 8 and 9, 2026, and by Centre on Peace Studies, 2 March 2026.
[8] Information provided by the Centre on Peace Studies, 2 March 2026.
[9] High Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia; Decision Number: Usž-3987/2024-2; decision available at: https://odluke.sudovi.hr/Document/View?id=c3d3594d-66d4-488b-9ac7-ac2408fc9d4f&q=Us%c5%be-3987%2f2024-2.
[10] Information provided by the Ministry of Interior, 2 March 2017.
[11] Information provided by the Ministry of Interior, Border Directorate, 17 August 2018.
[12] Information provided by Centre for Peace Studies, 2 March 2026.