Freedom of movement

The “province of residence” system[1]

Each applicant is assigned to a province, where he or she shall register with the PDMM, secure private accommodation by their own means and stay there as long as they are subject to international protection, including after obtaining status. This dispersal scheme is based on Article 71 LFIP, according to which the PMM rarely refers an applicant to a Reception and Accommodation Centre but generally to take up private residence in an assigned province.

The RFIP elaborates the dispersal policy. It defines the concept of “satellite cities” as provinces designated by PMM where applicants for international protection are required to reside.[2] While new applicants for international protection can initiate their application in a province not listed in the list and may remain there until they are assigned and referred to a satellite city.[3] Stakeholders reported that PMM appeared to have stopped using the concept of “satellite cities” by the end of 2022. (See: Applications on the territory)

According to the latest notice, the number of distinct remains the same, but the number of cities increased to 63.[4] According to the last available list, 62 provinces in Türkiye were listed as open/closed cities for the referral of international protection applicants.[5] However, they are mostly closed to international protection applications.[6]

In practice, however, not all provinces are available to applicants. It is up to the individual PDMM to decide on the ‘opening’ or ‘closing’ of the cities and on referrals there to depending on their capacity. When a PDMM is ‘closed’, it usually processes existing applications to issue International Protection Application Identification Cards and Temporary Protection Identification Cards. The ‘closure’ or ‘opening’ of a PDMM is not officially or publicly notified.

The regulation of the “satellite city” system is not based on publicly available criteria, nor is there an official decision taken in respect of each applicant. In general, metropoles and border cities do not usually figure among satellite cities. According to stakeholders, the concept of “satellite cities” was abandoned in 2023,[7] while currently it is referred to as “province of residence”. However, it remains unclear whether this reflects a specific policy change, or rather just a change in the terminology officially adopted.

Since there is only one operational Reception and Accommodation Centres with a capacity of 100 places, currently almost all international protection applicants are in self-financed private accommodation in their assigned provinces.

Since PMM took over the registration process there is no official list of open and closed cities for registration of Syrians and non-Syrians but stakeholders can receive information upon request from the PDMM. The situation also changes according to capacity[8].

It is prohibited by PMM for any region or area in Türkiye to have a population of foreign nationals that is more than 20% of the total population. The rate, which was 25% in 2022, was reduced to 20% in 2023.  This includes both people who have made Türkiye their permanent home and those who are merely visiting the country. As of July 2023, 1,169 neighbourhoods in 63 different provinces are now closed to foreign nationals seeking address registrations for temporary protection, international protection, and residence permits, as well as changes to their city of residence if they are foreign nationals with residence permits or are under temporary or international protection, with the exception of new-borns, instances of nuclear family reunification, accessing to higher education and foreigners with Turkish Descent. Because of this, no non-Turkish national will be able to select any of these 1,169 neighbourhoods in Türkiye as their registered address for official matters, nor will they be able to ask the authorities to change their address to any of these places. Many neighbourhoods in the metropolitan cities such as Adana, Ankara, İstanbul, İzmir, Muğla, and Antalya fall into this category.[9] In practice, individuals who were already residing in a neighbourhood that had been closed to the registration of foreign nationals were allowed to continue living there. Moreover, they were permitted to move to another apartment within the same neighbourhood, despite the area being officially closed to new foreign registrations.[10]

Following changes to the LFIP in December 2019, the law now foresees an administrative fine for those who provide accommodation to unregistered foreigners even unknowingly. In 2022, property owners who provided housing to undocumented foreigners without a contract were subjected to fines of 26,750 TRY. If the property is sealed for three consecutive months, it may be done so permanently. If the same act is repeated by a hotel, the hotel may be sealed for up to three months and its certificate may be revoked.  In 2022, police operations were widespread in Istanbul, where 13,648 homes were inspected and 684 of them were fined 19,800 TRY for violating article 9 of the Identity Notification Law No. 1774.[11]

Travelling outside the “province of residence” and sanctions

The PDMM has the authority to impose an obligation on applicants to reside in a specific address, as well as reporting duties.[12] In practice, applicants are not subject to strict reporting requirements, but their effective residence in the address declared to the PDMM is monitored if they do not appear before the PDMM for prolonged periods. In this case, the PDMM might conduct unannounced checks.

Any travel outside the assigned province is subject to written permission by the PDMM and may be permitted for a maximum of 30 days, which may be extended only once by a maximum of 30 more days.[13]

As of November 2019, travel permits could be obtained through the online system (E-Devlet) through refugees’ e-accounts. Refugees are expected to get a password from National Postal Services. In 2024, some people continued to have difficulties in accessing the online system still due to language barriers.[14] It was also reported that only 30-day travel permits could be obtained online. The applicant ought to contact PDMM for permits exceeding 30 days.[15] In 2024, despite ongoing challenges related to digital literacy, individuals were able to obtain travel permits through the E-Devlet system, particularly for reasons related to health, employment, or education. Requests based on less critical grounds were generally not considered eligible for travel authorization.[16]

Failure to stay in an assigned province has very serious consequences for the applicant. International protection applicants who do not report to their assigned province in time or are not present in their registered address upon three consecutive checks by the authorities are considered to have implicitly withdrawn their international protection application.[17] In practice, if the person is not found at their declared address, the PMM may issue a “V71” code declaring that the applicant is in an “unknown location” (Semt-i meçhul) following a residence check.

Furthermore, applicants’ access to reception rights and benefits provided by the LFIP are strictly conditional upon their continued residence in their assigned province. The International Protection Applicant Identification Card is considered valid documentation only within the bounds of the province where the document was issued. They may also be subject to Reduction or Withdrawal of Reception Conditions if they fail to stay in their assigned satellite city.

In practice, however, applicants may be subject to even more severe – and arbitrary – sanctions such as administrative detention in a Removal Centre,[18] with a view to their transfer to their assigned province (see Grounds for Detention). It seems, however, that the rigour of sanctions for non-compliance with the obligation to remain in the assigned province varies depending on the nationality, sexual orientation or gender identity or civil status of the applicant (e.g. single woman) or simply due to the working relationship of the applicant with the PDMM staff. Afghan applicants, for example, often face stricter treatment than other groups. Even where released from Removal Centres after being detained for non-compliance with the obligation to reside in their assigned province, asylum seekers are often required to regularly report to the Removal Centre or to a PDMM in a different province from the one where they reside.

It is possible for applicants to request that PMM assign them to another province on grounds of family, health or other reasons.[19] Requests for a change in assigned province for other reasons may be granted by the PMM Headquarters on an exceptional basis. Where an applicant is unhappy about their province of residence assignment and their request for reassignment is denied, he or she can appeal this denial by filing an administrative appeal with the IPEC within 10 days or filing a judicial appeal with the competent Administrative Court within 30 days.

Registration in another city, so non-compliance with the obligation to remain in the assigned province, is one of the most common reason to be targeted by the Mobile Migration Points, when a refugee who resides in another city than their registered/assigned city without a travel permit is identified, they are invited to go to the city where they registered in, or to the removal centres, they might face the fear of deportation.[20]

Stakeholders reported that in 2024, individuals who failed to comply with their reporting obligations or travelled outside their province of residence were subjected to an administrative fine (idari para cezası) of 6,425 TL and issued the N-169 Restriction Code for “Failure to Comply with Administrative Obligations Determined by the Ministry” (Bakanlıkça Belirlenen İdari Yükümlülüklere Uymama). Although these fines were incorporated into the LFIP in 2019, they had not been widely enforced until recently.[21]

In 2024, an Afghan applicant originally residing in İzmir was reassigned to Kayseri, and a Congolese applicant to Giresun, following changes in their designated provinces of residence. Both had initially settled in İzmir with support from NGOs and had managed to secure housing. However, upon being instructed to relocate, their requests for additional time were denied. In the Afghan applicant’s case, her lawyer approached Kayseri PDMM to obtain the legal notification of the ‘deemed withdrawn’ decision, but recalling a 2023 incident where an applicant was detained under similar circumstances, they instead challenged the decision in administrative court. The objection highlighted the difficulties asylum seekers face in relocating—such as terminating rental agreements, securing new housing, and covering associated costs—particularly in the first six months during which they are not permitted to work legally. Despite these arguments, the court dismissed the economic and practical concerns and rejected the case. The same outcome was observed in the Congolese applicant’s case. In both instances, the applicants were ultimately deemed to have withdrawn their international protection applications solely due to their inability to comply with the relocation order under restrictive conditions[22].

[1] As per PMM Circular No. 2022/01 dated 06.06.2022, the term “province of residence” (ikamet ili) is now officially used to designate the province in which an asylum seeker is required to reside, replacing the previously used term “satellite city.” Given that individuals may not always live in the province where they are officially registered, this term can also be interpreted as referring to the province of registration.

[2] Article 2(hh) RFIP.

[3] Article 66(3) RFIP.

[4] PMM, “İstanbul’da 39 İlçenin Yabancıların İkamet İzinlerine Kapatıldığı” İddialarına İlişkin Basın Açıklaması, 16 July 2023, available here.

[5] For the earlier list of cities as of August 2017, see Refugee Rights Türkiye, Avukatlar için mülteci hukuku el kitabı, August 2017, available in Turkish here, 409.

[6] Information provided by a stakeholder, June 2023.

[7] Information provided by stakeholders, Macrh – April 2024.

[8] Information provided by stakeholders, Macrh – April 2024.

[9] PMM, ‘Neighbourhood Closure Announcement, 30 June 2022, available in Turkish here & PMM, “İstanbul’da 39 İlçenin Yabancıların İkamet İzinlerine Kapatıldığı” İddialarına İlişkin Basın Açıklaması, 16 July 2023, available here.  

[10] Information provided by a stakeholder May 2025.

[11] Milliyet, ‘Kaçak göçmenlere ev kiralayan yandı!’, 1 April 2022, available in Turkish here.  

[12] Article 71(1) LFIP.

[13] Article 91(1)-(2) RFIP.

[14] Information provided by a stakeholder, May 2023.

[15] Information provided by a stakeholder, May 2023.

[16] Information provided by a stakeholder, May 2025.

[17] Article 77(1)(ç) LFIP.

[18] Information provided by several stakeholder, May 2023.

[19] Article 110(5) RFIP.

[20] Information provided by stakeholders, March – April 2024.

[21] Information provided by a stakeholder, February 2025.

[22] Information provided by a stakeholder, April 2025.